topic about girl child education

Home / Learning / Child Education / Why Girl Child Education Is Important?- The Impact And Necessity

Why Girl Child Education Is Important?- The Impact And Necessity

Highlighting the significance of girl child education, this article delves into the critical role it plays in empowering communities and fostering social progress. We will explore the multifaceted benefits of educating girls, including improved health, economic development, and gender equality. Additionally, we will provide actionable insights and practical solutions to promote and support girl child education.

Girl child education is a critical aspect of societal advancement. It represents not just the empowerment of half the population but also a cornerstone for global development.

Educating girls lays a foundation for a more informed and equitable society. It transcends mere literacy, encompassing a range of life skills that are vital for personal and community growth.

Education for girls leads to better health outcomes, reduced poverty levels, and stronger economies. It challenges and changes long-standing gender biases, paving the way for more balanced and inclusive decision-making in all spheres of life.

The ripple effects of educating a girl child are profound, impacting not just the individual but generations to come.

This introduction aims to highlight the undeniable importance and far-reaching benefits of girl child education , a critical tool for achieving sustainable development and a more equitable world.

How Has The Role Of Education In A Girl’s Life Changed Over Time?

The role of Education in a girl’s life has undergone significant transformation over time. Historically, girls’ access to Education was limited, often confined to basic literacy and domestic skills.

Education for girls was not a priority in many cultures, rooted in gender biases and societal norms that favored male Education.

In the early 20th century, there was a gradual shift. More girls began attending school, though often in gender-segregated environments.

The curriculum was typically different from boys’, emphasizing home economics and “feminine” skills over academic or professional training.

Post World War II, the global perspective on women’s roles began to change more rapidly. The women’s liberation movement and other social changes emphasized equality and rights, including the right to Education.

This period saw a significant increase in the number of girls receiving formal Education and pursuing higher studies.

In recent decades, the focus has shifted to not just providing access but also ensuring quality education for girls. Efforts have been made to make curricula gender-neutral and inclusive, offering girls the same opportunities as boys.

Girls are now encouraged to pursue careers in traditionally male-dominated fields like science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM).

Today, the role of Education in a girl’s life is recognized as a cornerstone for her empowerment and a key to breaking the cycle of poverty.

Educated girls are more likely to delay marriage and childbirth, have healthier children, and contribute economically to their families and communities.

The digital age has further expanded opportunities for girls’ Education, making it more accessible and inclusive.

What Are The Prevailing Misconceptions About Girl Child Education?

Several prevailing misconceptions about girl child education still exist, impacting the global effort to provide equal educational opportunities for girls. These misconceptions include:

• Education is Less Important for Girls: A deep-rooted belief in some cultures is that educating girls is less important than educating boys. This stems from traditional views about gender roles, where a woman’s primary responsibilities are seen as domestic and child-rearing.
• Girls are Less Capable Learners: There’s a myth that girls are inherently less capable of learning or understanding complex subjects, especially in areas like science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). This is a baseless stereotype that has been debunked by numerous studies showing girls perform equally well, if not better, in these areas.
• Investment in Girls’ Education Doesn’t Yield High Returns: Some believe that investing in a girl’s Education doesn’t yield significant benefits, either because they will eventually prioritize family over career or because they don’t have the same earning potential as men. In reality, educating girls leads to a range of societal benefits, including economic growth and improved family health.
• Educated Girls Reject Traditional Values: There’s a fear that Education leads girls to reject traditional cultural values and roles. While Education does encourage critical thinking and independence, it doesn’t inherently lead to a rejection of cultural values but often contributes to a more informed and balanced perspective on them.
• Girls’ Education Increases the Risk of Unwanted Social Change: Some believe that educating girls leads to unwanted social change, including higher divorce rates or lower birth rates. While Education does empower women to make informed choices about their lives, these changes are generally beneficial to society as a whole.
• Distance Learning is Sufficient for Girls: With the advent of technology, some assume that remote or distance learning is sufficient for girls’ Education. While technology is a valuable tool, it cannot fully replace the social, emotional, and interactive aspects of in-person learning.

RELATED: The Montessori Preference: Why Wooden Toys Take Center Stage

Why Is It Crucial To Address The Topic Of Girl Child Education Today?

Addressing the topic of girl child education today is crucial for several compelling reasons

Gender Equality

Education is a fundamental right. Ensuring girls have equal access to Education is a critical step towards achieving gender equality. Educated girls are more likely to participate in decision-making processes, both in their families and communities, promoting a more balanced and inclusive society.

Economic Growth

Educating girls contributes significantly to economic development. Educated women are more likely to enter the workforce, earn higher incomes, and contribute to the economic growth of their communities and nations.

Improved Health Outcomes

Education leads to better health choices. Educated women tend to have fewer, healthier, and well-nourished children. They are more aware of healthcare needs and can better manage health issues affecting their families.

Breaking the Cycle of Poverty

Education is a powerful tool for breaking the cycle of poverty. Educated women are more likely to invest in their children’s Education and well-being, perpetuating a cycle of prosperity for future generations.

Social Change and Empowerment

Education empowers girls to become agents of change. It provides them with the skills and knowledge to challenge and change societal norms that limit women’s roles and opportunities.

Reduced Child Marriage and Improved Family Planning

Educated girls are more likely to marry later and make informed decisions about family planning. This leads to more stable and economically secure families.

Global Commitments and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Educating girls is key to achieving several of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals, including gender equality, quality education, reduced inequalities, and economic growth.

Building Resilient Communities

Educated women are better equipped to respond to challenges, including economic crises and natural disasters. Their participation in community leadership roles leads to more resilient and adaptive societies.

In What Ways Do Cultural Beliefs And Practices Influence Girl Child Education?

Cultural beliefs and practices significantly influence girl child education in various ways:

• Gender Roles and Expectations: In many cultures, traditional gender roles dictate that a woman’s place is in the home, taking care of the family. This belief can lead to a lower prioritization of Education for girls, as it’s seen as less relevant to their perceived future roles as wives and mothers.
• Early Marriage: Cultural practices like early or child marriage often disrupt a girl’s Education. Once married, girls are expected to leave school to start families or manage household responsibilities, cutting short their educational journey .
• Preference for Boys’ Education: In some cultures, there’s a distinct preference for educating boys over girls, stemming from the belief that boys will become the breadwinners and carry on the family name. This can result in allocating limited family resources toward the Education of boys while girls are left behind.
• Safety and Modesty Concerns: Cultural norms around safety and modesty can also hinder girls’ access to Education. Concerns about girls traveling to and from school or attending mixed-gender schools can lead families to keep their daughters at home.
• Curriculum and School Environment: Cultural beliefs might influence the content and delivery of Education. This can include gender-biased curricula that reinforce stereotypes or a school environment that is not conducive to girls’ participation, such as a lack of adequate sanitation facilities.
• Economic Factors: In cultures where girls are seen as economic burdens, families might prefer to invest in sons who are viewed as future providers. This economic perspective can reduce the perceived value of investing in girls’ Education.
• Religious Beliefs: In some contexts, religious interpretations play a role in shaping attitudes towards girls’ Education. While many religions advocate for Education, some interpretations might restrict girls’ access to certain types of Education or promote segregation.
• Community Expectations: Peer pressure and community expectations can also play a role. In societies where educating girls is not the norm, parents may be less inclined to educate their daughters, fearing social ostracism or criticism.

How Does Educating Girls Impact The Economy Of A Country?

Educating girls significantly impacts the economy of a country in several key ways:

• Increased Workforce Participation: Education equips girls with the skills and knowledge needed to enter and compete in the workforce. An increase in educated women expands the labor pool, contributing to the country’s productivity and economic growth.
• Higher Earnings and Economic Growth: Educated women are more likely to earn higher wages and gain employment in skilled occupations. Higher earnings not only improve the standard of living for their families but also stimulate economic growth through increased spending and investment.
• Reduced Poverty Rates: Education is a critical tool in breaking the cycle of poverty. Educated women are more likely to find work, earn more, and contribute economically to their households and communities, thereby reducing overall poverty rates.
• Boost to Innovation and Productivity: Diverse educational backgrounds bring different perspectives to problem-solving and innovation. Including more educated women in the workforce can lead to more creative solutions and improvements in productivity.
• Enhanced Family Well-Being and Investment in Future Generations: Educated women tend to invest more in their families. They are more likely to spend their income on their children’s Education and health, leading to better-educated and healthier future generations, which are key factors in long-term economic stability and growth.
• Greater Economic Resilience: Diverse and inclusive economies are generally more resilient to economic shocks. By empowering women through education, a country can build a more flexible and robust economy capable of withstanding global economic fluctuations.
• Demographic Benefits: Educated women often have fewer children and start families later, contributing to lower birth rates and reduced strain on resources. This demographic transition can result in a more manageable population growth, allowing for better economic planning and resource allocation.
• Promotion of Gender Equality in the Workplace: Educated women challenge gender stereotypes in the labor market, promoting gender equality. This can lead to more equitable and inclusive workplaces, which have been shown to be more successful and innovative.

What Are The Social Benefits Of Educating Girls For The Community And Society At Large?

Educating girls brings numerous social benefits to the community and society at large:

• Improved Family Health: Educated women are more knowledgeable about health and nutrition, leading to better health care decisions for themselves and their families. This results in healthier families and reduced strain on public health systems.
• Reduction in Child and Maternal Mortality: Education enhances women’s understanding of healthcare and family planning, contributing to lower rates of child and maternal mortality. Educated mothers are more likely to seek prenatal care, have safer childbirths, and ensure their children are immunized.
• Enhanced Child Education : Educated mothers place a higher value on Education and are more likely to ensure their children, both boys and girls, receive an education. This creates a positive cycle of Education and empowerment in communities.
• Promoting Gender Equality: Girl child education is a critical step towards gender equality. Educated girls grow into women who can advocate for their rights and contribute to breaking down gender stereotypes and barriers.
• Economic Stability and Growth: As educated women enter the workforce, they contribute to the community’s economic stability and growth. They invest their earnings in their families and communities, leading to overall economic development.
• Reduced Rates of Child Marriage: Education provides girls with alternatives to early marriage, enabling them to pursue personal development and career goals. This delays the age of marriage and reduces the incidence of child marriage in communities.
• Social Cohesion and Community Engagement: Educated women are more likely to participate in community activities and decision-making processes. Their involvement leads to more inclusive and cohesive communities.
• Environmental Stewardship: Education often includes awareness of environmental issues. Educated women can play a crucial role in advocating for sustainable practices and contributing to environmental conservation efforts.
• Reduced Poverty and Improved Standard of Living: By breaking the cycle of poverty, Education leads to an overall improved standard of living in communities. This results in less dependence on social welfare and a more robust, self-sufficient community.
• Political Participation and Leadership: Education empowers women to engage in political processes and leadership roles, bringing diverse perspectives to policy-making and governance, which benefits society as a whole.

Educating girls yields substantial social benefits for communities and society at large:

• Improved Health Outcomes: Educated women tend to make informed health choices, resulting in better health outcomes for themselves and their families. This includes lower rates of child and maternal mortality and better nutritional practices.
• Decrease in Child and Forced Marriages: Education helps delay the age of marriage for girls. Educated girls are more likely to make informed decisions about their lives, including marriage, thereby reducing the incidence of child and forced marriages.
• Enhanced Child Education and Development: Educated mothers are more likely to educate their children, creating a positive cycle of Education and opportunity. They also tend to be more engaged in their children’s educational and developmental activities.
• Economic Empowerment and Poverty Reduction: Education equips girls with skills for better job opportunities, leading to economic empowerment. Educated women contribute to their families and communities, reducing poverty levels.
• Gender Equality and Empowerment: Education is key to empowering girls and women, leading to greater gender equality. Educated women are more likely to participate in decision-making at home and in their communities, challenging gender norms and promoting equality.
• Community Development and Resilience: Educated women contribute to the social and economic development of their communities. They bring diverse perspectives to community issues, fostering more resilient and inclusive societies.
• Political Participation and Leadership: Education empowers women to engage more actively in political processes, enhancing their representation and leadership in governance, which leads to more inclusive policies.
• Cultural and Social Change: Educated women can challenge and change harmful cultural practices and norms. They often advocate for social justice, contributing to a more progressive and tolerant society.
• Environmental Stewardship: Educated women are more likely to be aware of and address environmental challenges, contributing to sustainable community practices.
• Reduction in Crime and Social Vices: Education contributes to lower crime rates and reduced engagement in social vices. Educated communities tend to be more peaceful and law-abiding.

How Does Education Contribute To The Health And Overall Well-Being Of Girls?

Education significantly contributes to the health and overall well-being of girls in various ways:

• Improved Health Knowledge: Education provides girls with essential knowledge about health, hygiene, nutrition, and physical fitness. This knowledge empowers them to make informed decisions regarding their health and the health of their families.
• Awareness of Health Rights and Services: Educated girls are more aware of their health rights and the availability of health services, including reproductive and sexual health services. They are better equipped to seek medical help and advocate for their health needs.
• Delayed Marriage and Childbearing: Education often leads to delayed marriage and childbearing, reducing risks associated with early pregnancies and childbirth, which can have long-term health implications.
• Mental Health Benefits: Education can boost self-esteem , confidence, and resilience, contributing to better mental health. The social interactions and problem-solving experiences in educational settings also support emotional and psychological development.
• Reduced Risk of Health Issues: Educated women are more likely to understand and avoid risk factors for diseases, leading to lower rates of health issues like obesity, heart disease, and sexually transmitted infections.
• Healthy Lifestyle Choices: Education encourages healthier lifestyle choices, such as regular exercise, a balanced diet, and avoiding harmful habits like smoking and excessive alcohol consumption.
• Increased Health Literacy: Education enhances health literacy, enabling girls to understand health information and services, which is crucial for effective health management and prevention of diseases.
• Economic Benefits Leading to Better Health: Education often leads to better job opportunities and higher income, which can provide access to better healthcare, nutrition, and living conditions, directly benefiting girls’ health.
• Empowerment to Challenge Harmful Practices: Educated girls are more likely to challenge harmful cultural practices that affect health, such as female genital mutilation (FGM) and dietary restrictions.
• Informed Family Planning: Education empowers girls and women to make informed choices about family planning, leading to healthier spacing and timing of pregnancies, which benefits both maternal and child health.

In What Ways Does Education Empower Girls And Promote Independence?

Education empowers girls and promotes independence in several significant ways:

• Knowledge and Skills Acquisition: Education equips girls with knowledge and skills that are essential for navigating life. This includes literacy, numeracy, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills , which are fundamental for personal and professional success.
• Economic Independence: Education leads to better job opportunities and the potential for higher income. This economic independence is crucial for girls to have control over their lives and make independent decisions.
• Informed Decision-Making: Educated girls are better equipped to make informed decisions about their health, relationships, and futures. They can independently assess information and make choices that are best for them.
• Self-Confidence and Self-Esteem: Education fosters a sense of self-worth and confidence. Knowledge and achievements in Education can significantly boost a girl’s confidence in her abilities.
• Social and Political Empowerment: Education gives girls the tools to engage in social and political spheres. It empowers them to advocate for their rights, participate in community decisions, and take on leadership roles.
• Breaking Gender Stereotypes: Education challenges traditional gender roles and stereotypes. It shows that girls can achieve just as much as boys, promoting gender equality.
• Delayed Marriage and Childbirth: Educated girls are more likely to delay marriage and childbirth, allowing them to focus on personal development and career goals.
• Awareness of Rights: Education raises awareness of legal and human rights. Girls learn about their rights and the protections they are entitled to, enabling them to stand against injustices like discrimination and abuse.
• Networking and Support Systems: Educational environments allow girls to build networks and support systems that can aid them personally and professionally throughout their lives.
• Lifelong Learning and Adaptability: Education instills a mindset of lifelong learning. This adaptability is key to independence, helping girls to navigate and thrive in a constantly changing world.

How Does Education Improve The Quality Of Life For Girls And Their Future Families?

Education profoundly improves the quality of life for girls and their future families in several ways:

Better Employment Opportunities

Education opens up higher-paying and more fulfilling job opportunities. Financial stability derived from such employment can significantly enhance the quality of life for girls and their future families.

Informed Health Choices

Educated girls have better knowledge about health, nutrition, and hygiene. This leads to healthier lifestyle choices for themselves and their families, resulting in overall improved family health.

Reduced Child and Maternal Mortality

Education is linked to lower rates of child and maternal mortality. Educated women are more likely to access prenatal care, ensure safe childbirth, and provide better childcare.

Enhanced Child Development

Educated mothers are more likely to understand the importance of early childhood education and developmental activities, contributing positively to their children’s physical, cognitive, and emotional development.

Economic Growth and Poverty Reduction

TEducation contributes to economic growth and can lift families out of poverty. Educated women are more likely to be economically productive and invest their earnings back into their families.

Social and Environmental Awareness

Education fosters awareness of social and environmental issues. Educated women can make informed decisions that benefit both their families and the broader community.

Delayed Marriage and Family Planning

Education leads to delayed marriage and childbirth, allowing women to make informed choices about family planning. This results in smaller, well-spaced families, improving the quality of life for each member.

Empowerment and Self-Confidence

Education empowers girls, fostering a sense of independence and self-confidence. This empowerment influences their role in the family, encouraging a more equitable and respectful family dynamic.

Intergenerational Benefits

The benefits of educating girls extend to future generations. Educated women are more likely to prioritize the Education and well-being of their children, perpetuating a cycle of opportunity and improved quality of life.

Community Engagement and Leadership

Educated women are more likely to participate in community activities and take on leadership roles. Their involvement can lead to community improvements that benefit not just their own families but also the wider society.

Can Education Be A Tool To Break The Cycle Of Poverty And Discrimination For Girls?

Yes, Education can indeed be a powerful tool to break the cycle of poverty and discrimination for girls. Here’s how:

• Economic Empowerment: Education opens doors to better employment opportunities and higher income potential. Educated girls can secure better jobs, contributing to their economic independence and breaking the cycle of poverty.
• Improved Health Outcomes: Educated women have better knowledge about health care, nutrition, and family planning. This leads to healthier families and reduced healthcare costs, contributing to economic stability.
• Delayed Marriage and Childbearing: Education encourages girls to delay marriage and childbearing, allowing them to focus on their personal and professional development. This delay often leads to smaller, healthier families and breaks the cycle of early marriage and poverty.
• Increased Awareness and Empowerment: Education empowers girls with knowledge about their rights and the skills to advocate for themselves. This awareness is crucial in combating discrimination and asserting their place in society.
• Generation Impact: Educated women are more likely to educate their children, creating a positive cycle that benefits future generations. This intergenerational Education is key in sustaining poverty reduction and combating discrimination.
• Social and Cultural Change: Education challenges traditional norms and stereotypes that discriminate against girls. Educated girls and women can become agents of change, influencing societal attitudes and practices.
• Community and Economic Development: Educated women contribute significantly to their communities and economies. Participating in the workforce and engaging in community decision-making help drive economic and social development.
• Political Representation and Policy Change: Education equips girls to engage in political processes, potentially leading to roles in leadership and policy-making. This representation is essential for enacting policies that combat poverty and discrimination.
• Reduced Dependency: Education reduces dependency on social welfare systems by empowering girls to be self-sufficient. This economic independence is crucial in breaking poverty cycles.
• Networking and Resources: Education provides girls with access to a wider network of peers and mentors, as well as resources that can aid in personal and professional development.

RELATED: Decoding Learning Philosophies: Montessori Vs. Reggio Emilia – A Tale Of Two Innovative Approaches

What Are Some Global Initiatives And Success Stories In Girl Child Education?

There are several global initiatives and success stories in girl child education, demonstrating the progress made in this vital area:

• Malala Fund: Founded by Nobel Prize laureate Malala Yousafzai, this fund focuses on advocating for girls’ Education worldwide. Malala’s own story of bravery and her fight for Education in Pakistan has inspired many and brought global attention to the cause.
• United Nations Girls’ Education Initiative (UNGEI): This initiative works globally to promote girls’ Education and gender equality. UNGEI partners with various organizations to support education policies, planning, and programming, making significant strides in improving access to Education for girls.
• Plan International’s “Because I am a Girl” Campaign: This campaign aims to end gender inequality by providing Education to girls. It has successfully raised awareness and implemented various programs that have significantly improved girls’ access to Education in several countries.
• Global Partnership for Education (GPE): GPE supports developing countries to ensure that every child receives a quality basic education, focusing on girls and the most vulnerable. They have made considerable progress in increasing school enrollment rates for girls.
• Room to Read: This organization focuses on literacy and gender equality in Education. They have successfully implemented programs in several countries, contributing to improved literacy rates and increased school completion rates for girls.
• Campaign for Female Education (CAMFED): CAMFED is an international non-profit organization tackling poverty and inequality by supporting girls to go to school and succeed. Their work has positively impacted millions of girls in Africa.
• Educate Girls: Focusing on India, this organization works towards enrolling out-of-school girls and improving foundational skills in literacy and numeracy. Their community-based approach has been effective in reaching thousands of girls.

Success Stories

• Rwanda: Post-genocide, Rwanda implemented policies to promote gender equality in Education. Today, the country boasts one of the highest rates of female education enrollment in Africa.
• Bangladesh: Government initiatives like stipend programs for girls have significantly increased girls’ enrollment in schools. Bangladesh has achieved gender parity in primary and secondary Education.
• Afghanistan: Despite facing significant challenges, efforts by various NGOs and the international community have helped increase the number of girls attending school in Afghanistan.

How Is Technology Shaping The Future Of Education For Girls?

Technology is playing a pivotal role in shaping the future of Education for girls, offering new possibilities and addressing traditional barriers. Here’s how:

• Increased Access: Technology, especially the internet and mobile devices, has made Education more accessible. Girls who previously couldn’t attend school due to distance, cultural norms, or safety concerns can now access educational resources online.
• Flexible Learning Environments: E-learning platforms and digital classrooms provide flexible learning environments. This flexibility is crucial for girls who might need to balance educational pursuits with household responsibilities or work.
• Personalized Learning: Technology enables personalized Education, catering to individual learning styles and paces. This personalization can be particularly beneficial for girls who might have missed school or need extra support in certain subjects.
• Interactive and Engaging Content: Digital tools and resources, such as educational apps, games, and virtual laboratories, make learning more interactive and engaging, enhancing girls’ interest and retention in STEM subjects.
• Safe Learning Spaces: In regions where girls’ safety is a concern, technology provides a secure way to continue Education without physically attending school.
• Global Connectivity and Exposure: Technology connects girls with peers, mentors, and educators worldwide, broadening their perspectives and exposing them to a wide range of cultures, ideas, and educational practices.
• Skill Development for the Modern World: Tech education equips girls with digital literacy and skills crucial for the modern workforce, such as coding, data analysis, and digital communication.
• Overcoming Gender Biases: Online Education can help overcome biases present in traditional classroom settings . Digital platforms often offer a more neutral environment where girls can freely express themselves and participate.
• Support for Disabled Girls: Technology offers assistive tools and resources for girls with disabilities, making Education more inclusive and accessible.
• Data-Driven Insights for Improvement: Technology enables the collection of educational data, which can be analyzed to improve teaching methods, curricula, and policies, ensuring they meet girls’ specific needs.

What Are The Current Challenges And Barriers To Girl Child Education?

Despite significant progress, there are still various challenges and barriers to girl child education:

• Socio-Cultural Norms: In many societies, traditional gender roles and biases persist, viewing Education for girls as less important or unnecessary. These norms can lead to prioritizing boys’ Education over girls’.
• Poverty: Economic constraints are a significant barrier. Families with limited resources often prioritize Education for boys. Girls are more likely to be kept at home for domestic work or because families can’t afford school fees and related costs.
• Early Marriage and Pregnancy: Cultural practices like early marriage and teen pregnancy limit girls’ opportunities for Education, as they often drop out of school to fulfill marital and maternal roles.
• Safety and Security Concerns: In some regions, girls face risks like harassment, violence, or long and unsafe commutes to school. These safety concerns can deter parents from sending their daughters to school.
• Lack of Sanitation Facilities: Inadequate sanitation facilities, especially during menstruation, are a significant barrier. Many girls miss school or drop out entirely due to the lack of private and hygienic facilities.
• Inadequate School Infrastructure: Poor infrastructure, lack of basic amenities, and overcrowded classrooms can make learning environments unsuitable, particularly impacting girls.
• Gender Biases in Curriculum and Teaching: Curricula and teaching methods that reinforce gender stereotypes can discourage girls from fully participating or pursuing certain subjects, particularly in STEM fields.
• Disabilities and Special Needs: Girls with disabilities face additional challenges, including a lack of accessible school facilities and materials and societal stigma.
• Armed Conflict and Emergencies: In conflict zones or areas affected by natural disasters, girls’ Education is often severely disrupted. They face increased risks of exploitation, violence, and a breakdown of the educational infrastructure.
• Technological Divide: In the digital age, the lack of access to technology and the internet can be a barrier, especially as educational resources increasingly move online.

How Can Policy And Governance Make A Difference In Girl Child Education?

Policy and governance play a crucial role in advancing girl child education. Here’s how they can make a difference:

• Legislation Supporting Education Rights: Enacting laws that mandate Education for all children, regardless of gender, can significantly impact girls’ Education. Governments can also implement policies that specifically target barriers affecting girls, such as laws against child marriage.
• Allocation of Adequate Resources: Governments can allocate sufficient budgetary resources to ensure that schools are accessible, safe, and equipped with the necessary facilities, including sanitation, to support girls’ Education.
• School Infrastructure Development: Policies aimed at improving and expanding educational infrastructure, especially in underserved areas, can increase access for girls. This includes building schools closer to communities to reduce travel distance and ensure safety.
• Curriculum Reform: Implementing curriculum changes that challenge gender stereotypes and include gender equality can create a more inclusive and supportive environment for girls.
• Teacher Training and Sensitization: Training teachers to be sensitive to the needs and challenges of girl students and to avoid gender biases in their teaching can foster a more encouraging learning environment.
• Scholarships and Financial Incentives: Offering scholarships, stipends, or other financial incentives to families can encourage them to keep their daughters in school, especially in regions where poverty is a major barrier.
• Community Engagement and Awareness Programs: Policies that include community engagement and awareness campaigns can change societal attitudes towards girls’ Education and mobilize community support.
• Support for Pregnant Girls and Young Mothers: Providing support for pregnant schoolgirls and young mothers, such as maternity leave from school and re-entry policies, can help them continue their Education.
• Child Protection Policies: Enforcing strict child protection policies within schools to prevent abuse and harassment can make schools safer for girls, encouraging attendance and retention.
• Data Collection and Monitoring: Implementing systems for monitoring and collecting data on girls’ Education can help assess progress, identify areas for improvement, and develop targeted interventions.

What Role Do Families And Communities Play In Supporting Girl Child Education?

Families and communities play a vital role in supporting girl child education:

• Valuing Education: When families and communities value Education , this attitude significantly influences girls’ school attendance and academic performance. Encouraging an education-positive environment is crucial.
• Financial Support: Families providing financial support for school-related expenses like uniforms, books, and fees can make a significant difference in whether a girl attends school.
• Reducing Household Burdens: Families can ensure that household responsibilities are shared or minimized so that girls have enough time and energy to focus on their Education.
• Emotional and Moral Support: Emotional encouragement from family members can boost a girl’s confidence and motivation to pursue Education. Moral support is crucial in helping girls overcome challenges and persist with their studies.
• Safety and Security: Ensuring a girl’s safety to and from school and within the community is a key concern. Families and communities can work together to create safe environments for girls to attend school.
• Challenging Gender Stereotypes: Families and communities that challenge traditional gender roles and stereotypes pave the way for girls to pursue education and career opportunities that were traditionally reserved for boys.
• Community-Based Education Programs: Communities can organize or support education programs, especially in areas where access to formal schooling is limited. This can include after-school programs, tutoring, and mentorship initiatives.
• Advocacy and Awareness: Families and community leaders advocating for girls’ Education can influence broader social norms and policies. This includes campaigning for better school facilities, more female teachers, and gender-sensitive curricula.
• Support for Teenage Mothers and Married Girls: Providing support for girls who are mothers or married to continue their Education is crucial. This can include flexible schooling options or childcare support.
• Promoting Role Models: Highlighting and celebrating female role models from the community who have pursued Education can inspire and motivate girls.

Final Thoughts

RELATED: The Montessori Legacy: How Maria Montessori Transformed The Landscape Of Education

Continued advocacy and investment in girl child education are imperative for fostering equitable, prosperous societies.

Education empowers girls with skills, confidence, and opportunities, leading to economic growth, improved health outcomes, and societal advancement. Neglecting this area risks perpetuating cycles of poverty, gender inequality, and diminished societal progress.

The long-term effects include stunted economic development, the unfulfilled potential of half the population, and the loss of diverse perspectives in solving global challenges.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is girl child education important.

Girl child education is crucial for several reasons. It empowers girls with knowledge and skills, leading to personal empowerment, economic growth, and improved health outcomes.

Educated girls contribute to the reduction of poverty, promote gender equality, and ensure better prospects for future generations.

Education enables girls to make informed decisions about their lives, thereby enhancing the overall well-being of communities and societies.

What Are The Main Barriers To Girl Child Education?

The main barriers include socio-cultural norms that undervalue girls’ Education, poverty that limits access to schooling, early marriage and pregnancy, safety concerns, inadequate school infrastructure, and lack of sanitary facilities.

Gender biases in curriculum and teaching, as well as challenges faced by girls with disabilities, also play a significant role.

How Can Communities Support Girl Child Education?

Communities can support girl child education by promoting the value of educating girls, ensuring their safety, and providing financial and moral support.

Community-based education programs, advocacy for better schooling facilities, and gender-sensitive curricula are also vital.

Additionally, challenging gender stereotypes and celebrating female role models can inspire and encourage girls to pursue their Education.

What Impact Does Educating Girls Have On A Country’s Economy?

Educating girls has a significant positive impact on a country’s economy. It leads to a larger, more skilled workforce, increases women’s participation in the labor market, boosts earnings, and contributes to economic growth.

Educated women are more likely to invest in their families and communities, leading to a reduction in poverty and economic stability.

What Are The Long-Term Benefits Of Girl Child Education?

The long-term benefits include sustained economic growth, reduced poverty and health disparities, and enhanced societal well-being.

Educated women are more likely to have healthier families, contribute to the economy, and participate in decision-making processes at all levels.

Furthermore, the benefits transcend generations, as educated women are more likely to ensure their children are educated, creating a positive cycle of empowerment and development.

https://centralasiainstitute.org/top-10-reasons-to-support-girls-education

https://www.saggfoundation.org/girls-education-overview.html

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/importance-girl-child-education-meeme-sarah

https://60millionsdefilles.org/en/5-top-reasons-girls-education-can-make-world-better-place

https://www.forbes.com/sites/unicefusa/2022/09/05/10-reasons-to-educate-girls

• Recent Posts

• 47 Amazing Aquarius Coloring Pages For Kids & Adults ( Free Download) - August 5, 2024
• 47 Golden 50th Birthday Coloring Pages For Kids & Adults(FREE DOWNLOAD) - August 2, 2024
• 47 Amazing Ireland Coloring Page For Adults & Kids (FREE DOWNLOAD) - August 2, 2024

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Top 10 Reasons Why Female Education is Important

The Unmatched Importance of Female Education

• Increased Literacy: Of the 163 million illiterate youth across the globe, nearly 63 percent are female. Offering all children education will prop up literacy rates, pushing forward development in struggling regions.
• Human Trafficking: Women are most vulnerable to trafficking when they are undereducated and poor, according to the United Nations Inter-Agency Project on Human Trafficking. Through providing young girls with opportunities and fundamental skills, this billion-dollar industry can be significantly undermined.
• Political Representation: Across the globe, women are underrepresented as voters and restricted from political involvement. The United Nations Women’s programmes on leadership and participation suggests that civic education, training and all around empowerment will ease this gap.
• Thriving Babies: According to the United Nations Girls’ Education Initiative, children of educated mothers are twice as likely to survive past the age of five. Foreign aid for schoolhouses and curriculum development could greatly benefit the East African country of Burundi , where nearly 16,000 children die per year.
• Safe Sex: A girl who completes primary school is three times less likely to contract HIV. With these statistics in mind, The World Bank calls education a “window of hope” in preventing the spread of AIDS among today’s children.
• Later Marriage: As suggested by the United Nations Population Fund, in underdeveloped countries, one in every three girls is married before reaching the age of 18. In a region where a girl receives seven or more years of education, the wedding date is delayed by four years.
• Smaller Families: Increased participation in school reduces fertility rates over time. In Mali, women with secondary education or higher have an average of three children. Counterparts with no education have an average of seven children.
• Income Potential: Education also empowers a woman’s wallet by boosting her earning capabilities. According to the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, also known as UNESCO, a single year of primary education has shown to increase a girl’s wages later in life by 20 percent.
• Thriving GDP: Gross domestic product also soars when both girls and boys are being offered educational opportunities. When 10 percent more women attend school, GDP increases by three percent on average.
• Poverty Reduction: When women are provided with equal rights and equal access to education, they go on to participate in business and economic activity. Increased earning power and income combat against current and future poverty through feeding, clothing and providing for entire families.

The sustainability and progress of all regions depend on the success of women across the globe. As President Obama said while addressing the United Nations General Assembly in 2012, “The future must not belong to those who bully women. It must be shaped by girls who go to school and those who stand for a world where our daughters can live their dreams just like our sons.”

– Lauren Stepp

Sources: PRB , U.N. Women, CFR, World Bank

Photo: Flickr

“The Borgen Project is an incredible nonprofit organization that is addressing poverty and hunger and working towards ending them.”

-The Huffington Post

Inside the borgen project.

• Board of Directors

International Links

• UK Email Parliament
• UK Gaza Ceasefire
• Canada Email Parliament
• Canada Gaza Ceasefire

Get Smarter

• Global Poverty 101
• Global Poverty… The Good News
• Global Poverty & U.S. Jobs
• Global Poverty and National Security
• Innovative Solutions to Poverty
• Global Poverty & Aid FAQ’s

Ways to Help

• Call Congress
• Email Congress
• 30 Ways to Help
• Volunteer Ops
• Internships
• Courses & Certificates
• The Podcast

Top 5 Reasons Why Girls’ Education Can Make the World a Better Place

• Girls Education

Almost two decades ago world leaders decided to invest in girls’ education. The results were amazing (if unsurprising): more families put their children – daughters and sons – into primary school. Enrolment surged as more children than ever before began to attend school.

Yet, the number of out-of-school children is slowly creeping up. And, worryingly, while schooling for girls and boys is a crucial part of development goals, girls remain at a disadvantage, often in not-so-obvious ways.

Globally, girls of primary school age remain out of school in higher numbers with 32 million out of school, compared to 28 million boys.

More disconcerting, though, is the fact that, for girls, the likelihood of ever returning to school once they drop out is significantly lower than it is for boys. In fact, according to the  UNESCO Institute of Statistics :

“15 million girls of primary school age will never have the opportunity to learn to read and write in primary school, compared to about 10 million boys.”

This has long-term consequences. We know without a doubt that while it is important to educate all children – girls and boys – putting a girl in the classroom and giving her a quality education leads to better, more sustainable and lasting results. It’s just a fact.

Education – especially girls’ education – is crucial for development.

Here are five of the most important reasons why girls’ education is the best way to achieve lasting change:

Girls’ education…

1. Lowers poverty . Girls and women can earn up to 20% more for each additional year of education. This powerful income-generating potential can help to lift women (and their families) out of poverty. A woman tends to reinvest her earnings into her family and her children – so everyone benefits when a girl is educated.

2. Improves health . Educated women tend to make better decisions regarding health and nutrition, leading to better health outcomes overall for themselves and their families. An educated mother is more likely to have her children vaccinated, her children are less likely to suffer from malnutrition and stunting and infants are more likely to survive beyond their fifth birthday.

3. Increases gender equality . When educated, a woman’s higher earning power can elevate her standing within her family and community, which can give her more of a say in important decisions. It also gives her more confidence to stand up for herself and to do what is best for herself and for her children.

4. Lowers rates of child marriage . While child marriage is a complicated, multifaceted issue, keeping girls in school longer reduces the chances that she will marry as a child. In fact, each year of secondary education reduces the likelihood of child marriage by 5 percentage points or more.

5. Creates a positive cycle . An educated mother is more likely to put her own children into school – girls and boys – thus creating a positive cycle for change and hope for the future.

Your support for the 60 million girls Foundation can help get us there.

Please follow us on Facebook and Twitter .

HelloParent

The Importance of Girl Child Education in Society.

The Importance of Girl Child Education cannot be overstated in its potential to transform societies, uplift communities, and drive sustainable development. Ensuring girls have access to quality education is not merely a matter of achieving gender equality but is essential for the holistic progress of any society. Through education, girls gain the knowledge, skills, and confidence to participate fully in economic, social, and political life, contributing significantly to the growth and strength of their communities.

The Far-Reaching Impact of Educating Girls

Economic Empowerment: Educated women are more likely to enter the workforce, earn higher incomes, and contribute to the economic development of their communities. This economic independence is crucial for the well-being of families and the prosperity of nations.

Improved Health Outcomes: Girls’ education is directly linked to better health outcomes for entire communities. Educated women have fewer children, delay childbearing, and are more likely to seek healthcare for themselves and their families.

Reduction in Child Marriage and Gender-based Violence: Education empowers girls to make informed choices about their lives, including the decision to marry later and resist violence. It raises awareness of their rights and provides them with the tools to advocate for themselves.

Enhanced Family Well-being: Educated women are more likely to invest in their children’s education and health, breaking the cycle of poverty and fostering a culture of learning in their families.

Strategies for Promoting Girl Child Education

Community Engagement and Awareness: Raising awareness about the benefits of girl child education is crucial in changing societal attitudes and norms that undervalue girls’ education.

• Financial Support and Scholarships: Providing scholarships and financial incentives can make education more accessible to girls, especially in low-income families.
• Safe and Inclusive Learning Environments: Creating safe, gender-sensitive, and inclusive learning environments encourages girls’ attendance and participation in school.
• Leveraging Technology: The use of digital tools, such as a school parent app , can enhance learning opportunities for girls and keep parents engaged in their daughters’ education.

The Role of Early Childhood Education

Early Childhood Education plays a pivotal role in setting a strong foundation for lifelong learning and development. Ensuring girls have access to early childhood education programs can significantly influence their academic success and personal development. It is during these formative years that children learn critical social, emotional, and cognitive skills, which are essential for their future educational journey.

The Importance of Child Education in Empowering Girls

Child Education as a whole, including early childhood and subsequent educational phases, is instrumental in empowering girls. It equips them with the knowledge and skills needed to lead fulfilling lives, make informed decisions, and contribute to their communities. Education is the cornerstone upon which girls can build a future of equality, opportunity, and choice.

The Importance of Girl Child Education in society is immense, offering far-reaching benefits that extend beyond the individual to the community and the wider world. It is a critical investment in the future, promising a more equitable, prosperous, and sustainable world. By addressing barriers to girls’ education, leveraging technology like school parent apps, and emphasizing early childhood education , we can ensure that every girl has the opportunity to learn, grow, and achieve her potential. The education of girls is not just a moral and human right—it is a necessity for a brighter future for all.

Frequently Asked Questions

Educating a girl child is crucial for several reasons. It empowers girls, promotes gender equality, reduces poverty, improves maternal and child health, lowers child marriage rates, enhances economic growth, and leads to overall societal development.

Girls’ education is vital for social progress and economic development. It enables girls to fulfill their potential, contribute to their communities, and break the cycle of poverty. Educated girls are better equipped to make informed decisions about their health, finances, and future.

Education for girls is essential for their personal growth, empowerment, and socioeconomic advancement. It provides them with knowledge, skills, and opportunities to pursue their aspirations, participate in decision-making processes, and become independent individuals capable of contributing positively to society.

In India, educating girl children is crucial for achieving gender equality, reducing poverty, improving health outcomes, and fostering economic development. It helps break societal barriers, promotes women’s empowerment, and creates a more inclusive and equitable society.

The conclusion of girl child education underscores its transformative impact on individuals, communities, and nations. By investing in girls’ education, societies can unlock their full potential, promote gender equality, and achieve sustainable development goals, leading to a brighter and more prosperous future for all.

In India, the right to education for a girl child is protected under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education (RTE) Act, which ensures free and compulsory education for all children aged 6 to 14 years, regardless of gender. Additionally, various government schemes and initiatives aim to promote girls’ education and eliminate barriers to their schooling.

Share this:

Leave a reply cancel reply, discover more from helloparent.

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Type your email…

Continue reading

Livelihoods

Health and nutrition

Emergencies

Gender equality

Climate and environment

View all countries

Concern Debates

Primary Schools

Secondary Schools

Educational Resources

Fundraising in Schools

1Planet4All

Events and campaigns

Concern Connect

Education Grants Scheme

View all news

Listen to our podcast

Our history

Testimonials

Institutional donors

Public donations

Annual reports

How money is spent

How we are governed

Codes and policies

Supply chains

• Christmas Survival Appeal

Lebanon Emergency Appeal

Gaza Crisis Appeal

Start your own fundraiser

Find a friend to sponsor

Fundraise locally

Sign up for Irish Life Dublin Marathon

Donate in memory

Leave a gift in your Will

Your donation and tax back

Become a corporate supporter

Partner with us

Concern Humanitarian Fund

Women of Concern Annual Awards

Staff fundraising

Payroll giving

Knowledge Matters Magazine

Global Hunger Index

Evaluations

Learning Papers

Donate today

Where we work

Schools and youth

Global Activism

Latest news

Read our 2023 annual report

How we raise money

Transparency and accountability

Fundraise for Concern

Concern Christmas Gifts

Other ways to give

Philanthropy & Major Gifts

Corporate support

Volunteer in Ireland

Knowledge Hub

Knowledge Hub resources

• Donate In Memory
• Gaza Appeal
• End The Wait Appeal
• Concern Gifts
• Green Shoots
• Volunteer with us
• Job vacancies

Girls’ education: Why it can change the world, and what we need to make it happen

Education is a fundamental human right. But, for millions of children around the world, this right often goes unacknowledged. 

This is especially true for girls: According to UNESCO , 132 million girls worldwide were out of school at the beginning of 2020. This was before COVID-19 lockdowns further compromised gender equality in education. Schooling was disrupted for 1.5 billion students, and millions of girls might not return to school. That would be a major setback for multiple reasons. 

Girls’ education: Facts and figures

• Before the COVID-19 pandemic, UNESCO estimated 132 million girls around the world were out of school
• The pandemic interrupted education for 1.5 billion students worldwide
• Adolescent girls (12-17) are the highest risk for dropping out of school in low-income countries
• About 40% of low-income countries have not taken any measures to support students who are most at-risk for exclusion
• Three-quarters of all primary-age children who may never set foot in school are girls
• Women still account for almost two-thirds of all adults unable to read 

Why is gender equality important in education?

We need gender equality in education to ensure that both girls and boys can access and complete programs of study, as well as become empowered equally in and through education. 

Large gender gaps exist in access to education, learning achievement, and continuing education, usually at the expense of girls. Despite global progress, more girls than boys remain out of school: 16 million girls will never attend school. What’s more, women account for two-thirds of the 750 million adults who are illiterate. 

Globally, only 66% of countries have achieved gender parity in primary education. At the secondary level, the gap widens significantly, with only 45% of countries achieving parity in lower-secondary education and 25% achieving parity in upper-secondary education. 

What are some of the problems encountered by girls in education?

There are many barriers to education for both girls and boys, including poverty, geographic isolation, and minority status beyond gender. However, girls face some unique challenges to accessing education. 

Harmful gender norms

Harmful gender norms result in many inequalities between girls and boys. While gender norms affect all children, they disproportionately affect girls. More than 575 million girls live in countries where inequitable gender norms contribute to violations of their rights, including to education.

School-related gender-based violence and unsafe learning environments

School-related gender based violence (SRGBV) is also a significant issue of gender inequality in education. Girls are often forced to walk long distances to school, increasing their risk of gender based violence (GBV) including sexual harassment, exploitation, and abuse. In the classroom, corporal punishment remains a reality in many schools, impacting overall well-being and also leading to lower attendance rates and higher dropout rates. One of the key challenges with SRGBV is that teachers may not be trained to identify or respond to GBV issues in school. They may also be the perpetrators of such violence. With poor accountability mechanisms, an unsafe learning environment will continue without any recourse.

Inadequate sanitation facilities

Adolescent girls face additional challenges. Limited access to sanitary products, coupled with a lack of private space to wash, change, or dispose of them makes it more difficult for girls to attend school when they are menstruating. Additionally, shame and stigma around this is one of the main examples of gender discrimination in education, often discouraging girls from attending school when they have their periods. 

Teenage pregnancy and child marriage

Girls who become pregnant often face significant stigma and discrimination from their communities. In many countries, government policies exclude pregnant girls from attending school. This can lead girls to drop out of school early and not return. Child marriage and education reach similar conclusions, with girls forced into early marriages and then expected to drop out of school to tend the home and start a family. 

Why is girls’ education important?

In the long term, more years of education can break the cycle of poverty by improving gender equality. This can be good for entire countries, but also have significant benefits for individual girls. 

Girls’ education delays early marriage and leads to smaller families

Researchers from the World Bank and the International Center for Research on Women examined 15 countries in sub-Saharan Africa (one of the regions of the world that is least conducive to education for girls). They found a strong relationship between education and child marriage. Each additional year of secondary education reduced the chances of child marriage. 

The study also showed that educated women tend to have fewer children and have them later in life. This generally leads to better outcomes for both the mother and her kids, with safer pregnancies and healthier newborns.

Girls’ education is linked to better health 

USAID found that girls with a basic education are generally more aware of safe sex. With a comprehensive sexual health curriculum, they are three times less likely to contract HIV/AIDS. Moreover, if all mothers completed primary education, maternal death rates would be reduced by two-thirds.

Education also helps students to develop skills like critical thinking, decision-making, and responsibility. Educated girls are also more likely to seek healthcare for themselves and their families. This is why the children of educated mothers are twice as likely to survive past the age of five.

Girls’ education increases their earning potential…

Educated women are more likely to work and even own their own businesses and generally earn higher incomes throughout their lives. According to UNESCO, a single year of primary education can increase a girl’s wages later in life by up to 20%. An extra year of secondary school can increase their wages by up to 25%. What’s more, women invest up to 90% of their income back into their family, compared to the average 30–40% that men invest back into their households. 

…as well as that of their country’s

It’s not just a girl or woman’s immediate family that benefits from her quality education. Studies have shown that, when 10% more girls in a given country attend school, that country’s gross domestic product increases by an average of 3% — which can make a huge difference in a developing economy. 

How does education promote gender equality?

Gender inequality is both a cause and consequence of inadequate or low-quality education. 

Gender-equitable education systems empower both girls and boys to develop life skills that help young people succeed, including self-management, communication, negotiation, and critical thinking. And both boys and girls benefit from this approach. 

Education also empowers girls and women to know and fight for their rights, and protects them from harmful gender practices, including child marriage and female genital mutilation (FGM). For men, education — especially gender-equitable education — helps them to be more equitable with the women in their lives. Educated men are also more likely to seek mental health support and less likely to abuse drugs and alcohol or engage in other high-risk behaviour. 

Girls’ education: Concern’s work

Concern’s work is grounded in the belief that all children — regardless of gender — have a right to a quality education. We integrate our education programmes into both our development and emergency work to give children living in extreme poverty more opportunities in life and supporting their overall well-being. Concern has brought quality education to villages that are off the grid, engaged local community leaders to find solutions to keep girls in school, and provided mentorship and training for teachers.

Our education programmes are designed to be gender-transformative, in keeping with the core values of all Concern programming. In addressing the unique barriers that each community faces to education, we also look at the barriers faced by girls within those communities, including lack of sanitary facilities, SRGBV, and other harmful gender norms that keep girls at home. 

Gender equality & education: Your concern in action

Child marriage and education: The blackboard wins over the bridal altar

Education for Syrian refugee children: How we're avoiding a “lost generation”

Education - Safe Learning Model Research

Share your concern.

• Current Issue
• Past Issues
• Get New Issue Alerts
• American Academy of Arts 
and Sciences

From Girls’ Education to Gender-Transformative Education: Lessons from Different Nations

The examination of gender inequality in education around the globe reveals a multi­faceted issue deeply intertwined with persistent challenges within education systems and society at large. Over the past three decades, girls’ education has often been portrayed as a panacea, touted as the solution to a wide array of societal problems, including issues as diverse as high fertility rates and global warming. This essay explores gender disparities in education, employing case studies from Latin America to elucidate the intricate dynamics of this global phenomenon and to illustrate the potential of gender-transformative approaches. Drawing upon two decades of empirical research and theoretical insights from the capability approach, I discuss the linkages between gender, education, and social transformation. 

Erin Murphy-Graham is an Adjunct Professor in the School of Education at the University of California, Berkeley. She works with local partners from civil society in Honduras and Colombia on issues of education, empowerment, and gender, most recently on the design of Holistic Education for Youth (HEY!), an intervention to prevent adolescent pregnancy and child marriage. Her recent publications include the edited volume Life Skills Education for Youth: Critical Perspectives  (with Joan DeJaeghere, 2022) .

Examining gender inequality in education globally brings to the surface many of the deeply rooted and persistent problems in education systems and society more broadly. For the last thirty years, girls’ education has been presented as the “answer to everything,” a cure-all for issues ranging from high fertility rates to global warming. 1  The importance of girls’ education first gained attention in economic discussions during the early 1990s, notably by Lawrence Summers. In his speeches and writings, he argued   that education for girls and women might offer the highest return on investment available in the developing world. Since that time, girls’ education has become a global rallying cry for politicians such as Boris Johnson (who referred to girls’ education as the “silver bullet, the magic potion, the panacea . . . that can solve virtually every problem that afflicts humanity”) and celebrities like Lady Gaga, Priyanka Chopra Jonas, and Rihanna. 2  Movie theaters across the globe have shown full-length documentary films about the importance of girls’ education,   including Girl Rising  (2013) and He Named Me Malala  (2015). More recently, girls’ education has been touted as a “powerful climate solution” capable of fighting the root drivers of climate change and cutting carbon emissions. 3   The importance of girls’ education has galvanized action among individuals, organizations, and governments that span a wide range of academic disciplines and political dispositions. 

But while some were praising girls’ education as a strategy to improve health outcomes, reduce fertility rates, raise income, and improve democracy, feminist scholars such as Nelly Stromquist argued that the gender gap in education was the manifestation of gender inequality in society. Simply expanding educational access for girls and women would not address the underlying causes of their underrepresentation in education. 4  Getting girls into schools is a necessary first step, but schools often reflect and reinforce harmful social inequalities, including gender norms. An emphasis on empowering girls and women through education and other social interventions (such as small loans, vocational training) began to emerge in the mid-1990s. Education  and empowerment of girls became and remain buzzwords, with little conceptual clarity as to what kind of education is empowering, in what context, and for what purpose. 

Despite over thirty years of sustained advocacy among various stakeholders, including civil society, multilateral organizations, and networks of feminist scholars, significant gender gaps in education remain, particularly in secondary schooling. The promise of girls’ education as a panacea has not materialized. Looking strictly at gender parity in education—that an equal number of male and female children are enrolled in school—it would appear that girls’ education is a global development success story. But what are girls (and boys) learning in school? How is schooling changing or challenging the social norms that perpetuate inequalities and inequities? The attention to girls’ education sparked a deeper examination in the field of international education development and raised fundamental questions about how to transform educational systems to become more appropriate for today’s world. 5

With the caveat that any brief review of international data is insufficient, it is a useful starting point for an exploration of gender and education around the globe. More girls participate in education and at higher levels than ever before. As Figure 1 illustrates, gender disparities continue to exist in Africa, the Middle East, and South Asia, but many countries have equal participation in schooling at the primary level. 

Significant historical turning points and international movements that have spurred this progress include the Education for all Movement (launched in 1990 and renewed in 2000) and the 1995 Fourth World Conference on Women and resulting Beijing Platform for Action. These convenings and subsequent declarations promulgated a set of principles, policy orientations, and actions. Among these were the goals of providing universal access to, and ensuring the completion of, primary education for all girls and boys and eliminating gender disparities in education. The United Nations’ most recent international development goals, known as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs, adopted by UN member states in 2015) include a target (4.1) to, “By 2030, ensure that all girls and boys complete free, equitable and quality primary and secondary education leading to relevant and effective learning outcomes.” 6

In 2016, the gender review that accompanies UNESCO’s annual Global Education Monitoring Report found that by 2014, gender parity was achieved globally, on average, in primary, lower-secondary, and upper-secondary schools. 7  Key here (as the report points out) is that parity  can wash away inequalities when comparing across countries or world regions. Parity is a statistical measure that provides a numerical value of female-to-male or girl-to-boy ratios. The problem is that in some countries and regions, girls are underrepresented in education, whereas in others, boys are underrepresented. Calculated as an average, these disadvantages are masked—and we have “global parity.” 

By 2022, the language around gender parity had softened somewhat, with UNICEF’s launch of a website with the headline, “most countries have achieved gender parity in primary enrollment, but in many countries, disparities disadvantaging girls persist.” 8  There are two key concerns associated with using gender parity as an indicator of gender equality. First, it masks both female and male disadvantage in education. As captured by a recent UNESCO global report on boys’ disengagement from education, boys are more likely than girls to repeat primary grades in one hundred thirty countries, and more likely not to have an upper-secondary education in seventy-three countries (the report features in-depth case studies from Fiji, Kuwait, Lesotho, Peru, and the United Arab Emirates). 9  Second, parity in both educational enrollment (children currently enrolled in school) and attainment (highest grade completed) does not necessarily translate into parity in learning outcomes. In a study measuring gender equality in education from forty-three low- and middle-income countries, the authors explain that in some settings, increases in enrollment may have led to a deterioration in the quality of education and a lower proportion of young people with basic literacy and numeracy skills. 10

In addition to examining the flawed statistic of educational parity in enrollment, common indicators of gender inequality also include the number of children out of school, as well as the number who complete primary, lower-secondary, and upper-secondary education. According to data from the World Bank, the primary school completion rate for girls has reached 90 percent globally, with an equal number of boys and girls completing primary school in most countries. Between 2000 and 2018, the number of out-of-school girls of primary school age decreased globally from fifty-seven million to thirty-two million. 11  As of 2023, roughly thirty-two million girls of primary school age were still out of school, compared with twenty-seven million boys. So while a roughly equal number of girls and boys are enrolled in primary school (gender parity), this statistic misses the more than fifty million children that remain out of school, and that more girls are out of school than boys. 12  Figure 2 shows trends in the out-of-school population of primary school–aged children between 2000 and 2019. 

With regard to primary school completion, in 2013, only 70 percent of children in low-income countries completed primary school, and only 14 percent completed secondary school. 13  Five years later, in 2018, estimates suggested that just 54.8 percent of children in low-income countries completed primary school. The COVID pandemic only added to the obstacles that children face in completing their primary education. 14    

There is general agreement that achieving target 4.1 of the SDGs remains a “distant reality.” 15  Global estimates of the gender gap in out-of-school rates are not informative because they mask regional variation. Additionally, looking at a global average can be misleading because the female advantage in some world regions zeros out the female disadvantage in others. As of 2023, the largest gender gaps disadvantaging girls remained at each level of the education system in sub-Saharan Africa and in Northern Africa and Western Asia. Likewise, in low-income countries, enrollment rates for young women in lower-secondary education were still 5 percentage points below that of young men; at the upper-secondary level, the female disadvantage was 9 percentage points. And most low- and middle-income countries have low overall rates of enrollment and attainment, particularly in the lower- and upper-secondary levels. 

What can we take away from this picture? First, gender gaps in education are a misleading indicator of progress. Second, for schools to not reflect or reproduce social inequalities but rather change the underlying roots of students’ gendered educational experiences, we need a more substantive understanding and recognition of what gender equality in education could or should entail across different contexts. The statistics help us see the symptoms of a much larger and more complex disease. Education, particularly gender-transformative education, could be leveraged as a process to heal and repair social systems that reflect patriarchy, colonialism, and racism. 16  

In a recent article, Elaine Unterhalter, a world-renowned comparative and international education scholar, reviews four key ideas that have framed the formulation of girls schooling and gender equality in education. Her delineation of these four framings helps conceptualize what gender equality in education should (and should not) entail. She calls these framings “what works,” “what disorganizes,” “what matters,” and “what connects.” 17  As general categories, they are useful tools to help understand the range of perspectives, policies, and interventions that characterize the field of girls’ education. 

“What works” is the approach consistent with the idea that girls’ education is a sound investment that has positive spillover effects in a variety of different domains (health, economic growth, civil society). It seeks to attain parity: an equal number of boys and girls enrolled in and completing school. This approach is concerned with girls’ education as something that “works” as an intermediary strategy to promote other desirable outcomes (such as poverty alleviation, improved child health and nutrition), as well as being a desirable outcome in and of itself. From this vantage point, policy and research have focused on interventions that increase the number of girls in school and the duration they stay there. These interventions might include reducing or abolishing school fees and/or providing girls with scholarships, reducing the distance to school, building toilets or latrines, providing school meals, and training teachers to improve their pedagogy. The what-works framing proposes largely technical solutions to address girls’ underrepresentation in education. The research methodology to test these approaches involves large-scale, randomized control trials to evaluate the effectiveness of a different combination of intervention characteristics. These research studies have helped us understand a great deal about certain kinds of barriers that girls face in attending school, particularly by providing clear and consistent findings that the costs associated with schooling are a huge deterrent for poor families. 18    

A second framing, what Unterhalter calls “what disorganizes,” concerns policies and actors that undermine or distract from what works and what matters—and is related to how girls’ education has been identified as a panacea. 19  These are instances where girls’ education is co-opted to promote the interests of large corporations and organizations. An illustrative example of this approach, Nike Inc.’s Girl Effect, is documented extensively in Kathryn Moeller’s book The Girl Effect: Capitalism, Feminism, and the Corporate Politics of Development . 20  Corporations such as Nike, Coca Cola, and Unilever have used the narrative guise of girls’ education and empowerment to expand their markets, improve their reputations, and grow their workforce. But as Moeller points out, their instrumental logic shifts the burden of development onto girls and women without transforming the structural conditions that produce poverty. Their efforts sidestep the practices of harmful business and working conditions, promoting a logic wherein consumption is the goal of development. In one project Unterhalter tags as “disorganizing,” Coca Cola and the British Department for International Development sponsored a £17 million training program for girls who would ultimately “join the Coca Cola value chain.” 21   Corporate social-responsibility initiatives such as these have also been called “gender wash”: corporations clean up their image by using gender, girls’ empowerment, and education as a palatable marketing tool. 

Recognizing the contradictions and problematic assumptions of “what disorganizes” in the field of girls’ education is important because it allows for a more profound questioning of “what matters.” A what-matters framing of girls’ education has a long history, as feminists have questioned the logic of “what works” for decades. However, as Unterhalter explains, this approach is supported by international organizations with less status and money, and uses different methods, including qualitative methods, that generate less respect in policy circles and more limited research funding. This makes it difficult to garner evidence that more wholistic, less technocratic approaches “work.” 22  A what-matters stance situates girls’ education in a wider, normative context linked to advancing human rights, gender equality, feminist advocacy, and ultimately a different vision of prosperity and well-being. Many writers and activists in this category emphasize girls’ voices and empowerment, the limitations of policy texts, and the need for a more comprehensive understanding of the cultural norms and practices connected with gender inequality across cultural contexts. Additionally, the meanings of “gender” and the questioning of gender binaries, heteronormativity, sexism, and patriarchy are considered from this stance. 

Writers from this perspective, including myself, emphasize that girls’ education makes up one element of advancing gender equality. To transform social structures and society at large, processes of change must come from political, economic, social, and cultural domains. Education, no matter how empowering, cannot singularly address all of society’s ills. 23   A framework for human flourishing known as the “capability approach” also undergirds questions of what matters and serves as a lodestar for envisioning a more prosperous and just future. The capability approach, developed initially by philosophers Martha Nussbaum and Amartya Sen, captures aspects of people’s lives such as their education, health, and their political and religious freedoms, and shifts the discourse on education from one emphasizing human capital to one that focuses on human capabilities. 24   Informed by the capability approach, many feminist authors have called for educational reforms that reflect a more nuanced and complex theorization of the role of education in promoting social justice. 25    

Informed by the capability approach, Unterhalter proposes the framing of “what connects” to bring together what matters and what works. A coupling of these perspectives aspires to build bonds between differentially positioned groups. “Connecting” means building “a coordinated, curated, or articulated form of exchange that emphasizes the morally responsive connections and forms of kinship bond between communities engaged with policy, practice, and research on girls’ education, gender equality, and women’s rights.” 26  It is not yet clear whether the what-connects framing will have traction as a policy idea or field of practice. It will require critical thinking, use of evidence, and a simultaneous focus on changing the systems of oppression and exclusion that characterize local and global communities. 

In Latin America, the need for a what-connects approach to gender and education is palpable. Framed differently, one might conclude that gender is not an important educational issue because countries have either reached gender parity or have a female advantage. An analysis of gender and education in Latin America allows us to ask important questions and restate a set of principles. 

First, gender is not synonymous with girls and women, as it often appears in policy documents and statements about education in developing-country contexts. Gender refers to the socially constructed roles, behaviors, expressions, and identities of girls, women, boys, men, and nonbinary or gender diverse people. It is often categorized as male, female, or nonbinary. Gender is social and cultural. However, it is often used incorrectly as a synonym for the biological sex a person is assigned at birth. A simple google search for “gender and education” will result in scores of hits that immediately begin by discussing girls’ underrepresentation in education systems, and the need to promote girls’ education as a strategy to advance gender equality. 

But in Latin America (and several other world regions or countries including North America, Australia, and the United Kingdom), girls outnumber and outperform boys. Policy experts in Latin America have called this a reverse gender gap. In Latin America, boys and young men are more likely to drop out of secondary and tertiary education. They have lower rates of enrollment and completion of secondary education than girls, starting at the lower-secondary level. At the university or tertiary level, men have lower enrollment rates than women in all countries of Latin America and the Caribbean. These patterns are referred to as one of the greatest gender-related challenges in the region. 27  Studies identify a number of factors at play, including boys prematurely joining the labor market in low-skill jobs, gender norms of masculinity that diminish the importance of education and emphasize that of male physical labor, and features of schooling that lead to low interest or low aspirations.

In addition to a reverse gender gap, overall participation rates in secondary education remain low, despite an increase in the availability of secondary schools over the past two decades. Both boys and girls might initially enroll in lower or upper high school, but a very small percentage go on to complete twelve years of schooling, as illustrated in Figure 3. Dropout from secondary school is a major challenge, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Estimates suggest that the likelihood of completing secondary school in Latin America prior to the pandemic was 52 percent, and just 32 percent post pandemic. 28  Latin America had the longest school closures of any region in the world during the pandemic, with schools remaining closed for one and a half years, on average. 

In addition to (and as a partial explanation for) the very low secondary-school completion rates, Latin America has one of the highest rates of adolescent pregnancy globally. It is the only region of the world where adolescent pregnancies have not decreased. It also has comparatively high rates of early union or marriage (prior to age eighteen). One-in-four young women in Latin America were married before their eighteenth birthday. In rural areas, these rates tend to be higher, and age younger, with one-in-ten girls marrying before the age of fifteen. There are a number of hypotheses for why this is the case, including 1) conservative mobilization to block gender and sexuality education, 2) regressive policies and abortion bans, and 3) social norms that restrict adolescent dating and sexuality and thereby push girls to have clandestine relationships or elope with their boyfriends. 

The experience in Latin America defies the underlying assumption that if more children and youth have access to secondary education, more girls will enroll, and society will reap the benefits of girls’ education. It also illustrates that a gender-girls’ perspective is problematic because addressing the reasons why girls are out of school will not automatically improve boys’ situation as well. While access to secondary schooling has expanded, dropout rates are soaring. The reasons for dropout are different for boys and girls, but a sense of disillusionment with the education system is widespread. It is only through the kinds of questions and research methods that connect a what-works with a what-matters perspective that we can gain a deeper understanding of what is happening in Latin America and what is needed to support systematic change.

Over the last two decades, I have been engaged in research partnerships that explore questions related to how education can empower youth and challenge harmful gender norms in Latin America. Much of my research has been in Honduras, a country that has faced challenges typical of many countries in the region, including stagnant and uneven economic growth, natural disasters, political corruption and instability, increased violence due to narco-trafficking and gang activity, and mass migration to the United States. Together with colleagues and students at the University of California, Berkeley, the Honduran National Pedagogical University, Wellesley College, and the Honduran civil society organization Asociación Bayan,   I have conducted research to better understand how education can empower youth and what “quality” education means in rural contexts. We have also explored the process by which girls decide to enter into early marriage, and the extent to which they demonstrate agency in that process. And we have examined, using both qualitative and quantitative methods, why youth discontinue their studies, and the intersections between dropout and gender. 

Beginning in 2008, our research team began a longitudinal study of rural Honduran youth. At the time of first data collection, research participants were just completing primary school (approximately twelve years old). We stayed in touch with these youth and conducted additional rounds of surveys and interviews one year, two years, and, in 2016, eight years later when they were young adults (approximately twenty years old). The longitudinal, mixed methods nature of our study allowed us to examine intersections between schooling, child marriage, and adolescent pregnancy, as well as decisions around school dropout. We found that household income in early adolescence predicts school discontinuation, early union, and early childbearing. Additionally, most girls had already discontinued their studies when they entered a union and/or became mothers (meaning that they did not drop out of school because they were pregnant or wanted to get married). The most common reasons for leaving school included a lack of financial resources and no longer wanting to be a student. Largely due to social norms and the responsibilities of childcare, only a small percentage of girls returned to school after becoming wives or mothers.

We also explored the data from surveys and in-depth qualitative interviews to determine the pervasiveness of traditional views on gender roles among Honduran youth, and how these norms are related to control of girls’ sexuality in rural areas of Honduras. We examined how these social norms converge with the biological, psychosocial, and cognitive changes experienced during adolescence and the social contexts in which adolescent girls’ lives are embedded. In Honduras and other countries in the region, formal or legal marriage is rare in rural communities; as such, we employ the term “early union.” While not legally binding, these relationships carry the cultural significance of marriage in rural communities, and individuals use the terms husband/wife and the verbs casarse  (to marry) and unirse  (to join together/unite) to characterize their roles and relationships. 

Our interviews suggested that parents’ desire to control girls’ sexuality ironically can backfire and influence girls’ decision-making to enter a union. In particular, the belief that sex should only occur within the context of a union encourages girls to see marriage as the only way to be involved in a romantic relationship. While girls are expected to adhere to these expectations and live in restrictive environments that control their mobility, their socialization opportunities, and their sexuality, girls are simultaneously going through normal developmental processes of adolescence. More specifically, they are developing a greater sense of autonomy, experiencing an emerging interest in intimacy and sexual relationships, under­going the physical and emotional changes that come with puberty, and developing sophisticated cognitive abilities connected to decision-making processes. The excessive protectiveness and the parental control of sexuality experienced by girls in rural areas of Honduras clash with the natural developmental changes that occur during adolescence, which ultimately influences their decision to enter early unions. Drawing upon these findings, we provide a rationale for why educational initiatives that explain and normalize the changes that occur during adolescence (particularly around attraction and intimacy) as well as challenge social norms and constructs that promote gender inequality should be a central component of child marriage education programming for adolescents, parents, and community members.

In addition to better understanding how early unions and pregnancy intersect with secondary school dropout, we also wanted to examine other issues related to gender. We were interested in why students were “no longer interested” in being students, despite having access to secondary school. Through statistical analysis and rich qualitative interview data, we discovered that dropout is patterned by schooling structures, such that more dropout occurs, for all adolescents, at the standard transition points (to lower-secondary school, to upper-secondary school, to tertiary school). We also observed that for both males and females, once a student drops out, they rarely return to school. Drawing from the capability approach, we used the concept of “conversion factors” to help explain our findings. Conversion factors refer to individuals’ ability to convert resources into “valued functionings,” to whether youth can reap the benefits of secondary education. We illustrate that, in the context of where these youth live, they have scarce opportunities to convert the resource of a high school diploma into a valued functioning, including a job. The youth we interviewed questioned whether education would lead to any change in their life trajectories, particularly in a context in which their future roles as wives and mothers (for girls) and breadwinners via agricultural or other manual labor (for boys) was all but certain. In particular, our findings regarding male school discontinuation provide further evidence that boys are distrustful of schooling as a guarantee of future employment and social mobility. The experience of Latin America shows that simply increasing the supply of schooling is not enough to address gender inequality in society.

Gender-transformative education has emerged as a way to frame how, in order to tap its transformative potential, education must go beyond closing gender gaps. Gender-transformative education is now a shared orientation among United Nations agencies, including UNICEF (United Nations Children’s Fund) and UNGEI (United Nations Girls’ Education Initiative), as well as leading nongovernmental actors such as Plan International, the Population Council, CARE, and Girls not Brides. Gender-transformative education calls for “nothing less than a fundamental reset of how we approach education.” 29  A recent joint statement by Plan International, UNGEI, and UNICEF posits that education has transformative potential, but to unlock this potential, change is needed in the way we educate. This approach recognizes that gender norms are extremely challenging to address because they are entrenched in every aspect of society, and education systems reflect and can reinforce these norms. And these norms are also harmful for men and boys. Dismantling patriarchy requires a transformative approach, one that recognizes how gender discrimination often intersects with discrimination based on poverty, race, class, ethnicity, caste, language, migration or displacement status, HIV status, disability, gender identity, and sexual orientation. Gender-transformative education actively seeks ways to address inequalities and reduce harmful gender norms and practices. As the joint statement explains:

Gender transformative education is about inclusive, equitable, quality education (SDG 4, particularly target 4.7) and nurturing an environment for gender justice for children, adolescents and young people in all their diversity (SDG 5, particularly target 5.1). Gender Transformative Education would remove barriers to education and boost progress towards important social shifts, such as the reduction of gender-based violence and early marriage, the promotion of gender equality, and women’s and girls’ leadership and decision-making roles. . . . Gender transformative education completely transforms education systems by uprooting inequalities. Gender transformative education seeks to utilize all parts of an education system–from policies to pedagogies to community engagement–to transform stereotypes, attitudes, norms and practices by challenging power relations, rethinking gender norms and binaries, and raising critical consciousness about the root causes of inequality and systems of oppression. 30

This is the most ambitious approach to gender and education that has been articulated to date. It goes beyond “gender sensitive” and “gender responsive” approaches that do not call for change in the social structures that cause discrimination and inequality. A gender-transformative approach recognizes that education alone cannot shift gender norms and power relations, but that addressing the social structures that cause inequality and discrimination is needed. To do so, a number of actions are identified as essential, including transforming policies and political engagement, pedagogy and the curriculum, the school environment, participation of children and young people, community leadership, stakeholder engagement, and evidence-generation. This approach connects efforts to address gender inequality in education with the broader quest for social justice. To use Unterhalter’s framing, it connects what works with what matters. 31

While ambitious, gender-transformative education is attainable. A recent report on gender-transformative programs to address child, early, and forced marriage and unions in Latin America and the Caribbean includes case studies of five promising practices from the region. 32  These five practices were identified through a scoping survey about encouraging approaches in the region, to which one hundred five organizations responded. The cases profiled include in-school gender-transformative sexuality education programs and what is known as safe-space approaches (which are outside of formal school settings). One of the programs profiled in the report, Holistic Education for Youth (HEY!), emerged from our research-practice partnership in Honduras. Despite a resurgence in opposition to comprehensive sexuality education and gender-­transformative approaches in the region, the HEY! program offers a glimmer of hope that gender-transformative education is possible. 33  

HEY! works in tandem with the Sistema de Aprendizaje Tutorial   (SAT) program, an innovative approach to lower- and upper-secondary school that operates in approximately one hundred twenty rural Honduran communities. Developed in Colombia by FUNDAEC (the Foundation for the Application and Teaching of Sciences), SAT was created in the early 1980s to promote development in the most disadvantaged rural areas of Colombia. In 1996, SAT began as a pilot program in Honduras, and was formally approved by the Honduran government as a formal education program (granting lower- and upper-secondary school degrees) in 2003. SAT has received several accolades, including inclusion as a “global solution” in the United Nations’ Generation Unlimited initiative for youth. The Brookings Institution, through its Millions Learning initiative, also included SAT as an example of innovative, quality education. 34  In Honduras, students study in the SAT program for six years, spanning grades 7–12 (lower- and upper-secondary school). In 2016, we launched the HEY! program to enhance the already extensive focus on gender inequality present in the SAT curriculum, providing additional lessons and a podcast for parents that explicitly address the causes and consequences of early marriage and union in Honduras, as well as content about sexual and reproductive health. 

The additional content provided by HEY!, coupled with the existing SAT curriculum, make it a promising model of gender-transformative public education for other regions, which we document in our research. 35  The conceptual framework of SAT revolves around a few core beliefs: 1) the oneness of humanity, 2) that justice is integral to achieving human progress and is a capacity that must be developed in individuals, communities, and institutions, 3) that gender equality is essential to achieving human prosperity, 4) that knowledge has the power to raise humanity from its present condition, and 5) that social change–the transformation of human society–will not take place unless individuals and social structures evolve to reflect the aforementioned principles. Coupled with these core principles are a number of transformative features of the SAT program that contribute to increased awareness of the need for gender equality in students, and to a shift in how they think about gender relations in their everyday lives. In the SAT program, gender equality is not a one-off lesson, but is rather woven across the curriculum; gender is linked with the larger concept of justice; students engage in reflection, dialogue, and debate; teachers are given the opportunity to reflect critically on their understanding of gender in professional development sessions; and the curriculum emphasizes that gender transformation requires change among individuals and in social structures such as the family. 

One example of many from the curriculum helps illustrate how this happens in practice. “Properties,” which is typically the first curricular unit studied by SAT students when they are in seventh grade, aims to “help young people advance in the capabilities that will enable them to describe the world they experience with increasing clarity.” 36   In a lesson on truthfulness, presented as an essential quality or “property” of a human being, the following is provided to students for their reflection and discussion: 

There is more to truthfulness than not telling lies. We should, of course, always tell the truth as we know and understand it. But what benefit will come from such truthfulness if what we think to be the truth is, actually, false? Another aspect of truthfulness, then, is the intention and the will to seek the truth with an open mind. For many centuries people believed that the Earth was flat. Later it was proved that they were mistaken. Their belief did not agree with reality; it was an error. If the intention and the will to seek the truth had not existed, humanity would still be thinking that the Earth is flat.

Can you think of a few erroneous ideas that humanity needs to reject today? What about the idea that some race is superior or inferior to another? That men are superior to women? That it is acceptable for one group of people to oppress another group? That it is acceptable for a few to possess extreme wealth while many suffer from hunger? 37

The lesson is presented in such a way as to challenge SAT students to identify whether the assumption that men are superior to women is in fact a belief that they have been exposed to; whether they accept that such a belief is erroneous, and why; and where gender inequality is linked to other forms of oppression and injustice. Rather than simply list, in the various SAT books (or even an isolated book that might focus solely on gender), why men and women are equal, what the problems facing most women are, and what to do about it, SAT units instead require students to come back to these themes time and again, from different angles, repeatedly challenging students to reflect on what equality looks like in practice in their local reality, and what they can do to promote it. Additionally, SAT’s “tutorial” pedagogy fosters an environment of healthy discussion and dialogue among members of the class. 38

Through our research, we have documented how HEY! and SAT use culturally grounded, context-specific scenarios and ask questions at the beginning, middle, and end of each lesson to promote group discussion and invite students to analyze and reflect upon their individual and social realities as well as their roles in promoting social change. We have demonstrated that students who study in SAT also have higher academic achievement in standardized tests in Spanish and mathematics than a statistically equivalent set of peers who study in traditional secondary schools. In sum, our research, spanning two decades, documents innovative features of SAT, including its linkages to building trust, improving civic responsibility, empowering girls and women, and preventing early pregnancy and union. Taken together, these studies provide ample evidence that gender-transformative education is not a pipe dream. 

Despite its potential, even gender-transformative education is not a panacea. Every school year, students in SAT drop out to migrate to the United States. Girls struggle to envision a future in which they have opportunities to work outside of their home, and they form unions with their boyfriends. Boys, not certain that their education will lead to improved employment prospects, prematurely begin working in manual labor. Even at its very best, an education system cannot change society without accompanying changes in other sectors, including the economy and politics. Education is potentially the most important long-term strategy to raise up individual and collective capacity for social change. Too often, quick fixes are touted as solutions to problems, solutions that might be important in the short term but are unlikely to result in deep and lasting change. Providing scholarships for girls is one example. While financial support might bring more girls into the education system, it does not address why they are underrepresented in the first place. 

For genuine change to unfold, a different vision is needed, one not focused solely on equal numbers of boys and girls attending and graduating from schools. This vision draws on a notion of prosperity and feminism consistent with the work of the late bell hooks (and is also consistent with the capabilities approach). 39  This clear but transformative vision of feminism and human flourishing, articulated more than twenty years ago by hooks, should remain at the heart of our efforts to promote gender-transformative education around the globe:

Imagine living in a world where there is no domination, where females and males are not alike or even always equal, but where a vision of mutuality is the ethos shaping our interaction. Imagine living in a world where we can all be who we are, a world of peace and possibility. Feminist revolution alone will not create such a world; we need to end racism, class elitism, imperialism. But it will make it possible to be fully actualized . . . able to create beloved community, to live together, realizing our dreams of freedom and justice. 40

• 1 Elaine Unterhalter, “An Answer to Everything? Four Framings of Girls’ Schooling and Gender Equality in Education,” Comparative Education 59 (2) (2023): 145–168.
• 2 Boris Johnson as cited in ibid., 145; and Educate Girls,   “ Ten Celebrities Campaigning for Girls’ Education ” (accessed August 28, 2023).
• 3 ClimateLinks, “ Why Is Girls’ Education Important for Climate Action? ” (accessed August 28, 2023); and Vanessa Nakate, “ Vanessa Nakate on How Girls’ Education Can Help Solve the Climate Crisis ,” The Economist , March 8, 2022.
• 4 Nelly P. Stromquist, “Romancing the State: Gender and Power in Education,” Comparative Education Review 39 (4) (1995): 423–454.
• 5 Lant Pritchett, The Rebirth of Education: Schooling Ain’t Learning (Center for Global Development, 2013).
• 6 See United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, “ 4. Quality Education ” (accessed September 18, 2024).
• 7 Rosie Peppin Vaughan, “Gender Equality and Education in the Sustainable Development Goals,” background paper prepared for the 2016 Global Education Monitoring Report Education for People and Planet: Creating Sustainable Futures for All (UNESCO, 2016).
• 8 UNICEF, “ Education ,” June 2022 (accessed March 6, 2024).
• 9 UNESCO, Leave No Child Behind: Global Report on Boys’ Disengagement from Education (UNESCO, 2022).
• 10 Stephanie R. Psaki, Katharine J. McCarthy, and Barbara S. Mensch, “Measuring Gender Equality in Education: Lessons from Trends in 43 Countries,” Population and Development Review 44 (1) (2018): 117–142.
• 11 World Bank Group, “ Education Statistics–All Indicators ,” 2023.
• 13 Psaki, McCarthy, and Mensch, “Measuring Gender Equality in Education,” 119.
• 14 See United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, “4. Quality Education.”
• 15 United Nations Commission on Population and Development, “ Population, Education, and Sustainable Development: Ten Key Messages .”
• 16 Plan International, “ Gender Transformative Education: Reimagining Education for a More Just and Inclusive World ” (accessed August 28, 2023).
• 17 Unterhalter, “An Answer to Everything,” 148.
• 18 See, for example, Erica K. Chuang, Barbara S. Mensch, Stephanie R. Psaki, et al., “PROTOCOL: Policies and Interventions to Remove Gender-Related Barriers to Girls’ School Participation and Learning in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of the Evidence,” Campbell Systematic Review 15 (3) (2019): e1047.
• 19 Unterhalter, “An Answer to Everything.”
• 20 Kathryn Moeller, The Girl Effect: Capitalism, Feminism, and the Corporate Politics of Development  (University of California Press, 2018).
• 21 Unterhalter, “An Answer to Everything,” 155.
• 22 See, for example, Ana Aguilera, Sarah Green, Margaret E. Greene, Chimaraoke Izugbara, and Erin Murphy-Graham, “Multidimensional Measures Are Key to Understanding Child, Early, and Forced Marriages and Unions,” Journal of Adolescent Health 70 (2) (2022): 345–346.
• 23 Erin Murphy-Graham, Opening Minds, Improving Lives: Education and Women’s Empowerment in Honduras  (Vanderbilt University Press, 2012).
• 24 Melanie Walker, “A Capital or Capabilities Education Narrative in a World of Staggering Inequalities?” International Journal of Educational Development 32 (3) (2012): 384–393.
• 25 Joan D. Dejaeghere, “Reconceptualizing Educational Capabilities: A Relational Capability Theory for Redressing Inequalities,” Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 21 (1) (2020): 17–35.
• 26 Unterhalter, “An Answer to Everything,” 157.
• 27 Ursula Casabonne and Daniela Maquera, Reducing School Dropout and Helping Boys at Risk (World Bank Group, 2023).
• 28 Nora Lustig, Guido Neidhöfer, and Mariano Tomassi, “ Back to the 1960s? Education May Be Latin America’s Most Lasting Scar from COVID-19 ,” Americas Quarterly , December 3, 2020 (accessed August 28, 2023).
• 29 Plan International, “Gender Transformative Education.”
• 31 Unterhalter, “An Answer to Everything.”
• 32 Child, Early and Forced Marriage and Unions (CEFMU) and Sexuality Working Group, Tackling the Taboo in Latin America and the Caribbean: Sexuality and Gender-Transformative Programmes to Address Child, Early and Forced Marriage and Unions–Report and Case Studies (Child, Early and Forced Marriage and Unions and Sexuality Working Group, 2022).
• 33 Flávia Biroli and Mariana Caminotti, “The Conservative Backlash Against Gender in Latin America,” Politics & Gender 16 (1) (2020).
• 34 Christina Kwauk and Jenny Perlman Robinson, Sistema de Aprendizaje Tutorial: Redefining Rural Secondary Education in Latin America (Center for Universal Education at Brookings, 2016.
• 35 Patrick J. McEwan, Erin Murphy-Graham, David Torres Irribarra, et al., “Improving Middle School Quality in Poor Countries: Evidence from the Honduran Sistema de Aprendizaje Tutorial,” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 37 (1) (2015): 113–137; Catherine A. Honeyman, “Social Responsibility and Community Development: Lessons from the Sistema de Aprendizaje Tutorial in Honduras,” International Journal of Educational Development  30 (6) (2010): 599–613; Erin Murphy-Graham and Joseph Lample, “Learning to Trust: Examining the Connections Between Trust and Capabilities Friendly Pedagogy through Case Studies from Honduras and Uganda,” International Journal of Educational Development 36 (2014): 51–62; Erin Murphy-Graham, Alison K. Cohen, and Diana PachecoMontoya, “School Dropout, Child Marriage, and Early Pregnancy Among Adolescent Girls in Rural Honduras,” Comparative Education Review 64 (4) (2020): 703–724; Erin Murphy-Graham and Graciela Leal, “Child Marriage, Agency, and Schooling in Rural Honduras,” Comparative Education Review 59 (1) (2015): 24–49; Alice Y. Taylor, Erin Murphy-Graham, Julia Van Horn, et al., “Child Marriages and Unions in Latin America: Under­standing the Roles of Agency and Social Norms,” Journal of Adolescent Health 64 (4) (2019): S45–S51; Diana Pacheco-Montoya, Erin Murphy-Graham, Enrique Eduardo Valencia López, and Alison K. Cohen, “Gender Norms, Control Over Girls’ Sexuality, and Child Marriage: A Honduran Case Study,” Journal of Adolescent Health 70 (3) (2022): S22–S27; and Diana Pacheco-Montoya and Erin Murphy-Graham, “Fostering Critical Thinking as a Life Skill to Prevent Child Marriage in Honduras: The Case of Holistic Education for Youth (HEY!),” in Life Skills Education for Youth: Critical Perspectives , ed. Joan DeJaeghere and Erin Murphy-Graham (Springer Nature, 2021).
• 36 FUNDAEC, “Properties” (curricular unit), 2005, Cali, Colombia.
• 38 Another example from the curriculum is a book students study during their first year (seventh grade) called Systems and Processes. Among its goals are for students to “act in the world with efficacy and promote constructive change” by “introducing words and concepts needed to speak about the many processes that continually unfold in the world and the systems in which they occur.” In the various lessons of the text, the human body is offered as an analogy for a well-functioning society, and the notion that even as the integrity of the body and its various subsystems (circulatory system, digestive system, and so on) are interdependent, “so too the health and well-being of society as a whole and that of the individuals within it that depend on one another.” In introducing the concept of a “system” so early in their studies, students can build the capacity to conceptualize and take actions toward the systemic transformations that are needed and consistent with a gender-transformative approach. See FUNDAEC, Systems and Processes  (FUNDAEC, 2005), vii–viii.
• 39 For an overview of the life and literary work of bell hooks, see Poetry Foundation, “ bell hooks, 1952–2021 .”
• 40 bell hooks, Feminism Is for Everybody: Passionate Politics (South End Press, 2000), x.

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. A lock ( ) or https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Keyboard Navigation

• Agriculture and Food Security
• Anti-Corruption
• Conflict Prevention and Stabilization
• Democracy, Human Rights, and Governance
• Economic Growth and Trade
• Environment, Energy, and Infrastructure
• Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment
• Global Health
• Humanitarian Assistance
• Innovation, Technology, and Research
• Water and Sanitation
• Burkina Faso
• Central Africa Regional
• Central African Republic
• Côte d’Ivoire
• Democratic Republic of the Congo
• East Africa Regional
• Power Africa
• Republic of the Congo
• Sahel Regional
• Sierra Leone
• South Africa
• South Sudan
• Southern Africa Regional
• West Africa Regional
• Afghanistan
• Central Asia Regional
• Indo-Pacific
• Kyrgyz Republic
• Pacific Islands
• Philippines
• Regional Development Mission for Asia
• Timor-Leste
• Turkmenistan
• Bosnia and Herzegovina
• North Macedonia
• Central America and Mexico Regional Program
• Dominican Republic
• Eastern and Southern Caribbean
• El Salvador
• Middle East Regional Platform
• West Bank and Gaza
• Dollars to Results
• Data Resources
• Strategy & Planning
• Budget & Spending
• Performance and Financial Reporting
• FY 2024 Agency Financial Report
• Records and Reports
• Budget Justification
• Our Commitment to Transparency
• Policy and Strategy
• How to Work with USAID
• Find a Funding Opportunity
• Organizations That Work With USAID
• Resources for Partners
• Get involved
• Business Forecast
• Safeguarding and Compliance
• Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility
• Mission, Vision and Values
• News & Information
• Operational Policy (ADS)
• Organization
• Stay Connected
• USAID History
• Video Library
• Coordinators
• Nondiscrimination Notice and Civil Rights
• Collective Bargaining Agreements
• Disabilities Employment Program
• Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey
• Reasonable Accommodations
• Urgent Hiring Needs
• Vacancy Announcements
• Search Search Search

5 Actions for Supporting Adolescent Girls

Here’s how usaid is building a brighter future for girls around the globe.

5 min read · Oct 11, 2024

The International Day of the Girl — Oct. 11 — reminds us all that the voices and aspirations of the world’s adolescent girls deserve to be heard and amplified.

Yet around the world, the dreams of too many adolescent girls are deferred: every three seconds, a girl is married before the age of 18. Complications from pregnancy and childbirth are the leading cause of death among adolescent girls. Globally, 119 million girls are out of school and, in countries affected by conflict, girls are more than twice as likely to be out of school than girls living in non-affected countries.

With the right opportunities and resources, the potential of the world’s more than 1.1 billion girls is limitless.

USAID invests in initiatives that help adolescent girls fully and meaningfully participate in their societies, claim their rights, and make informed decisions about their lives, as outlined in the U.S. Global Strategy to Empower Adolescent Girls .

Take Kanykei — growing up in the Kyrgyz Republic, her parents discouraged her from studying and eventually forced her to drop out of school. She got a job to support her future education, but her father spent her earnings and arranged for her to marry an older man. Kanykei fled and was referred to the Oasis Foundation, where, with USAID’s support, she was able to return to school.

Since childhood, I have dreamt of becoming a neurosurgeon — and I haven’t given up on that dream,” she explains. “My plans are to successfully finish school and enter a medical school, to become a doctor.”

USAID shares five key actions to support adolescent girls globally to reach their potential.

Through USAID’s “Safe Migration in Central Asia” project and Oasis Kyrgyzstan’s “Caring for One — Caring for Everyone,” Kanykei received support, including psychological assistance, to return to school and pursue her dreams of one day becoming a neurosurgeon. / USAID

1. Enhance girls’ access to quality education in safe environments. In many countries around the world, adolescent girls are forced by their families to leave school to earn an income; perform unpaid caregiving and domestic work; or marry early. Others may face physical or sexual violence and harassment at or on the way to school. USAID supports initiatives that enhance girls’ access to quality education in safe environments. In Nigeria, for example, where 60% of out-of-school children are girls, USAID supported the country’s Ministry of Education to provide over 21,000 out-of-school adolescent girls with foundational non-formal learning opportunities that helped them return to formal education.

Through vocational training and empowering champions to advocate for change, the initiative raised awareness and advocated against GBV, including female genital mutilation and cutting, sexual harassment, and child, early and forced marriage and unions. / USAID

2. Provide economic opportunities and incentives for girls and their families. To help families keep their daughters in school and delay marriage to adulthood, USAID provides families with scholarships, stipends, or conditional cash transfers to help mitigate economic pressures within poorer households. USAID also works to increase families’ financial security by providing adolescent girls with financial literacy, income generating opportunities, vocational training, and access to capital and to technology. For example, in Egypt in 2023, USAID supported a new business development center, which provides adolescent girls and young women with training on entrepreneurship, English, and information technology to enhance their career pathways.

U.S. Ambassador to Ghana Virginia Palmer (front row, third from right) and some current and previous YOLO cast members at the premiere of YOLO Season 6 on Jan. 20, 2023.

The series reached adolescent girls in Ghana with information about menstrual health and hygiene, peer pressure, navigating parent-teen relationships, bullying, teacher-student relationships, alcohol and drugs, and the importance of respectful, safe, and healthy romantic relationships.

3. Foster adolescent girls’ empowerment by providing information, skills, services, and supports that improve their wellbeing. Increasing girls’ awareness of and access to skills, services, information, and support networks beyond formal education is critical. This is why USAID supports efforts to increase girls’ awareness of their rights and ability to advocate for themselves around the world. In Ghana, for example, USAID supports a youth television series, YOLO, or “You Only Live Once ,” which exposed an estimated 200,000 adolescent girls to accurate health information, and highlighted positive social and cultural norms to advance gender equality.

Treaser Nyirenda works with a USAID-supported project in Malawi to train youth champions to engage with traditional and faith leaders to eliminate harmful cultural norms and practices that propagate child, early and forced marriage and unions. / Haneeph Maulana

4. Work with communities to shift harmful norms and prevent and respond to gender-based violence. Adolescent girls and boys face discriminatory gender norms — or social rules — that restrict the attributes, roles, and behaviors that are valued and considered acceptable within a given culture or social group. These harmful norms contribute to inequalities; perpetuate gender-based violence; prevent girls from completing their education; and impede girls from reaching their life goals. USAID partners with local organizations and leaders around the world to address these harmful gender norms and practices. In Malawi, for example, USAID supported youth to form a social movement to respond to child, early and forced marriage and unions. In 2023, the initiative prevented over 200 cases of child, early and forced marriage and unions and reached over 2,000 youth with behavioral change messages.

Out-of-school adolescent girls attend a non-formal learning center in Borno, Nigeria, as part of USAID’s Opportunities to Learn Activity. / USAID

5. Strengthen policy and legal frameworks and accountability. Globally, many legal frameworks and country policies do not protect girls from violence and discrimination — whether from failing to consider girls’ needs, actively discriminating against girls, or not enforcing anti-discrimination provisions. USAID works to strengthen laws and policies that support adolescent girls — such as in Indonesia, where USAID partnered with provincial and local governments to establish regulations and procedures to address child, early and forced marriage and unions and to improve government planning and budgeting, as well as monitoring and evaluation, thereby strengthening the government’s response to this critical issue.

Read more  about what the U.S. government is doing to support adolescent girls’ leadership and full participation around the world.

.   .   .   

About The Author

Jamille Bigio is the Senior Coordinator for Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment at USAID.

Share This Page