animal testing medical research essay

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Lock Locked padlock icon ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

• Publications
• Account settings
• Advanced Search
• Journal List

Animal Testing and Medicine

Rachel hajar , m. d..

• Author information
• Copyright and License information

Address for correspondence: Rachel Hajar, M.D., Director of Non-Invasive Cardiology Section, Department of Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, P.O. Box 3050, Doha, Qatar. E-mail: [email protected]

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

“The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated.” - Mahatma Gandhi

Animals have been used repeatedly throughout the history of biomedical research. Early Greek physician-scientists, such as Aristotle, (384 – 322 BC) and Erasistratus, (304 – 258 BC), performed experiments on living animals. Likewise, Galen (129 – 199 / 217 AD), a Greek physician who practiced in Rome and was a giant in the history of medicine, conducted animal experiments to advance the understanding of anatomy, physiology, pathology, and pharmacology. Ibn Zuhr (Avenzoar), an Arab physician in twelfth century Moorish Spain, introduced animal testing as an experimental method for testing surgical procedures before applying them to human patients.

In recent years, the practice of using animals for biomedical research has come under severe criticism by animal protection and animal rights groups. Laws have been passed in several countries to make the practice more ‘humane’. Debates on the ethics of animal testing have raged since the seventeenth century. Theodore Roosevelt in the nineteenth century stated, “Common sense without conscience may lead to crime, but conscience without common sense may lead to folly, which is the handmaiden of crime.”

Those against, contend that the benefit to humans does not justify the harm to animals. Many people also believe that animals are inferior to humans and very different from them, hence results from animals cannot be applied to humans. Those in favor of animal testing argue that experiments on animals are necessary to advance medical and biological knowledge. Claude Bernard, known as the father of physiology, stated that “experiments on animals are entirely conclusive for the toxicology and hygiene of man. The effects of these substances are the same on man as on animals, save for differences in degree”. Bernard established animal experimentation as part of the standard scientific method.

Drug testing using animals became important in the twentieth century. In 1937, a pharmaceutical company in the USA created a preparation of sulfanilamide, using diethylene glycol (DEG) as a solvent, and called the preparation ‘Elixir Sulfanilamide’. DEG was poisonous to humans, but the company's chief pharmacist and chemist was not aware of this. He simply added raspberry flavoring to the sulfa drug, which he had dissolved in DEG, and the company marketed the product. The preparation led to mass poisoning causing the deaths of more than a hundred people. No animal testing was done. The public outcry caused by this incident and other similar disasters led to the passing of the 1938 Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act requiring safety testing of drugs on animals before they could be marketed.

Another tragic drug fiasco occurred in the late 1950s and early 1960s with thalidomide. It was found to act as an effective tranquilizer and painkiller and was proclaimed a ‘wonder drug’ for insomnia, coughs, colds, and headaches. It was found to have an inhibitory effect on morning sickness, and hence, thousands of pregnant women took the drug to relieve their symptoms. Consequently, more than 10,000 children in 46 countries were born with malformations or missing limbs (phocomelia, from the Greek meaning ‘limb’). The drug was withdrawn in 1961 and 1968 after a long campaign.

The above-mentioned incidents and others illustrate the harm to humans from the use of substances that have not been first tested on animals and underline the importance of animal experimentation to avert or prevent human tragedy. The practice of using animals in biomedical research has led to significant advances in the treatment of various diseases.

Issues such as ‘cruelty’ to animals and the humane treatment of animals are valid concerns, and hence, the use of animals in experimentation is greatly regulated. This has led to the 3Rs campaign, which advocates the search (1) for the replacement of animals with non-living models; (2) reduction in the use of animals; and (3) refinement of animal use practices. However, total elimination of animal testing will significantly set back the development of essential medical devices, medicines, and treatment. By employing the 3Rs when continuing to use animals for scientific research, the scientific community can affirm its moral conscience as well as uphold its obligation to humanity to further the advancement of science for civilization and humanity.

• View on publisher site
• Collections

Similar articles

Cited by other articles, links to ncbi databases.

• Download .nbib .nbib
• Format: AMA APA MLA NLM

Add to Collections

Animal Testing and Medical Breakthroughs Research Paper

Sample Animal Testing and Medical Breakthroughs Research Paper. Browse other research paper examples and check the list of argumentative research paper topics for more inspiration. If you need a research paper written according to all the academic standards, you can always turn to our experienced writers for help. This is how your paper can get an A! Also, chech our custom research proposal writing service for professional assistance. We offer high-quality assignments for reasonable rates.

This research paper examines the profound impact of animal testing on the advancement of medical breakthroughs. It delves into the historical context of animal experimentation, tracing its evolution, and addressing ethical concerns and regulatory frameworks. Through an exploration of prominent case studies, it highlights the pivotal role animal testing has played in numerous medical discoveries, emphasizing its contributions to the development of treatments and therapies. Ethical considerations and the ongoing debate surrounding the use of animals in research are thoroughly examined, alongside emerging alternatives and the challenges researchers face. Ultimately, this paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the ethical, scientific, and practical dimensions of animal testing in medical research and offers insights into its future role in the ever-evolving landscape of scientific discovery and healthcare.

Academic Writing, Editing, Proofreading, And Problem Solving Services

Get 10% off with 24start discount code, i. introduction.

Animal testing has long been an integral component of biomedical research, contributing significantly to our understanding of disease mechanisms, drug development, and medical innovations. This introduction provides an overview of the multifaceted role of animal testing in medical research, examining both its historical evolution and contemporary relevance. As Hau and Bosch (2019) noted, the practice of using animals for scientific experimentation dates back centuries, yet it remains a subject of intense ethical debate. The crux of this research problem lies in reconciling the undeniable scientific advancements made through animal testing with the ethical concerns surrounding the treatment of sentient beings. This study seeks to navigate this complex terrain by elucidating the ethical dimensions, scientific significance, and future prospects of animal testing. Its significance lies in shedding light on a critical aspect of medical research that impacts not only scientific progress but also the ethical and moral considerations associated with it. To achieve this, the paper is structured to explore the historical context, ethical considerations, scientific breakthroughs, alternative methods, challenges, and the future outlook of animal testing in medical research. Through this multifaceted analysis, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of the nuanced role of animal testing in shaping the landscape of modern medicine.

II. Historical Context of Animal Testing

The historical roots of animal testing in medical research run deep, tracing back to the earliest inquiries into biology and physiology. This section provides a brief historical overview of the evolution of animal testing, highlighting key milestones and developments that have shaped its contemporary significance. Aristotle, in ancient Greece, was one of the earliest proponents of animal dissection for understanding anatomy (Swanson, 1994). However, it wasn’t until the Renaissance period that animal experimentation began to take on a more systematic form. The groundbreaking work of William Harvey in the 17th century, who used vivisection on animals to elucidate the circulatory system, marked a pivotal moment in the history of medical research (Shampo & Kyle, 2000).

Throughout the 19th and 20th centuries, animal testing became increasingly prevalent, with scientists like Louis Pasteur and Robert Koch using animals to develop vaccines and study infectious diseases. These milestones underscored the crucial role of animal testing in advancing medical knowledge and public health.

However, the growing use of animals in research raised ethical concerns, leading to the development of regulations and guidelines. The landmark “Three Rs” principles, introduced by Russell and Burch (1959), emphasized the reduction, refinement, and replacement of animal testing wherever possible. These principles laid the foundation for ethical considerations in animal research, ultimately leading to the establishment of regulatory bodies like the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) in the United States, which oversees the ethical treatment of animals in research settings.

As we delve further into the ethical concerns and regulations surrounding animal testing, we will explore the delicate balance between scientific progress and ethical responsibility, shedding light on the complexities that have defined this practice throughout history.

III. Animal Models in Medical Research

Animal models have been instrumental in advancing our understanding of diseases, testing potential treatments, and developing new medical technologies. In this section, we will explore the types of animals commonly used in research, the justifications for their use, and the inherent strengths and limitations associated with these models.

Types of Animals Commonly Used in Research

A wide variety of animal species have been employed in medical research, ranging from rodents (mice and rats) to larger mammals such as dogs, rabbits, and primates. The choice of animal model depends on the specific research goals and the physiological similarities to humans. For instance, rodents are often preferred for genetic studies due to their short lifespans and ease of genetic manipulation, while primates are utilized for studies with a higher degree of anatomical and physiological similarity to humans (Festing & Wilkinson, 2007).

Justifications for Using Animals in Research

The use of animals in research is justified on several grounds. First and foremost, animals are used because they share biological similarities with humans, allowing researchers to investigate the mechanisms of diseases and the efficacy of potential treatments in a living system (Greek & Greek, 2010). Additionally, animals offer a level of control and standardization that is challenging to achieve with human subjects, enabling researchers to reduce variability in experimental outcomes. Animal models also play a crucial role in toxicity testing, drug development, and the assessment of new medical devices, contributing to the safety and effectiveness of healthcare interventions (Weichbrod et al., 2002).

Strengths and Limitations of Animal Models

Animal models have undeniably contributed to numerous medical breakthroughs, but they are not without their limitations. One major limitation is the inherent biological differences between species, which can lead to discrepancies in how diseases manifest and respond to treatments (Shanks & Greek, 2009). The ethical concerns surrounding animal testing are also a significant drawback, as the practice raises questions about the moral treatment of sentient beings (Ormandy et al., 2019). Furthermore, the cost, time, and complexity associated with animal studies can be prohibitive.

In this context, it is essential to recognize that while animal models have been indispensable in advancing medical research, they are just one tool in the scientific arsenal. Alternative methods and technologies, such as in vitro studies and computational modeling, are being developed to complement and, in some cases, replace animal testing, with the ultimate goal of reducing the reliance on animal models while continuing to advance medical knowledge and innovation.

IV. Medical Breakthroughs Achieved Through Animal Testing

Animal testing has played a pivotal role in numerous medical discoveries that have transformed healthcare and saved countless lives. This section explores compelling case studies and examples of significant breakthroughs attributed to animal testing, while also examining the ethical dilemmas and controversies that have arisen as a result.

Case Studies and Examples of Medical Discoveries

• Polio Vaccine: One of the most celebrated examples is the development of the polio vaccine by Dr. Jonas Salk in the 1950s. Salk’s vaccine was made possible through extensive testing on monkeys, leading to the eventual eradication of polio in many parts of the world (Sabin, 1956).
• Insulin Therapy: The discovery of insulin as a treatment for diabetes can be traced back to experiments on dogs by Frederick Banting and Charles Best in the early 1920s. Their groundbreaking work paved the way for insulin therapy, transforming diabetes management (Bliss, 1982).
• Heart Surgery Techniques: Animal testing has been instrumental in the development of cardiac surgical techniques and devices. For instance, the use of pigs as models for open-heart surgery procedures has revolutionized cardiovascular medicine (Gibbon, 1954).

Highlighting the Role of Animal Testing

These breakthroughs underscore the indispensable role of animal testing in advancing treatments and therapies. Animal models have provided essential insights into disease mechanisms, safety testing of drugs, and the development of surgical procedures. Without such testing, the translation of scientific discoveries into clinical applications would be considerably hindered.

Ethical Dilemmas and Controversies

Despite the undeniable contributions of animal testing to medical progress, ethical dilemmas and controversies have persisted. Critics argue that the benefits should not come at the expense of animal suffering. The use of sentient beings in experiments raises questions about the moral and ethical treatment of animals (Pound & Bracken, 2014). Additionally, the practice has spurred debates regarding the necessity of animal testing in an era where alternative methods, such as organ-on-a-chip technology and computational modeling, are becoming increasingly sophisticated and reliable (Hartung, 2020). These controversies compel us to strike a delicate balance between scientific advancement and ethical considerations, fostering ongoing dialogues and efforts to refine and reduce animal testing in research while still ensuring the progress of medical science.

V. Ethical Considerations

The ethical dimension of using animals in research is a critical aspect that demands careful examination. This section delves into the ethical frameworks employed to evaluate the use of animals in research, the ongoing debates surrounding animal rights and welfare, and the regulatory mechanisms that govern animal testing.

Ethical Frameworks for Evaluating Animal Research

Ethical considerations in animal testing are often guided by various frameworks that aim to strike a balance between scientific progress and animal welfare. One widely accepted framework is the “Three Rs” principle, introduced by Russell and Burch in 1959. This framework advocates for the Reduction, Refinement, and Replacement of animal testing wherever possible (Russell & Burch, 1959). It encourages researchers to minimize the number of animals used, refine experimental procedures to reduce suffering, and seek alternative methods to replace animal testing. These principles have since become the cornerstone of ethical decision-making in animal research.

Debates Surrounding Animal Rights and Welfare

The use of animals in research has sparked intense debates about animal rights and welfare. Advocates for animal rights argue that animals have inherent moral value and should not be subjected to experimentation (Regan, 1983). Conversely, proponents of animal welfare emphasize the importance of minimizing harm and suffering to animals used in research while acknowledging the potential benefits that may arise from such experiments (Rollin, 1989). Striking a balance between these perspectives is challenging, as it requires weighing the potential human benefits against the moral considerations of animal suffering.

Regulations and Guidelines Governing Animal Testing

To address these ethical concerns and ensure the humane treatment of animals in research, numerous regulations and guidelines have been established globally. In the United States, for example, the Animal Welfare Act and the Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals provide a regulatory framework for the ethical treatment of animals in research settings (Animal Welfare Act, 1966; Public Health Service, 1986). Additionally, institutional bodies such as the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUCs) are responsible for overseeing and approving research protocols involving animals, ensuring that they comply with ethical standards and legal regulations.

Internationally, organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Society for the Protection of Animals (WSPA) have contributed to the development of guidelines and standards for the ethical use of animals in research (WHO, 1985; WSPA, 2011). These regulations and guidelines aim to uphold both the scientific rigor of research and the ethical treatment of animals.

Balancing the imperative to advance scientific knowledge with ethical considerations remains an ongoing challenge, prompting continuous dialogue and efforts to refine research practices and reduce the use of animals whenever feasible, all while ensuring the welfare of both humans and animals.

VI. Alternatives to Animal Testing

In recent years, the pursuit of alternatives to animal testing has gained momentum, driven by both ethical concerns and advancements in scientific methodologies. This section explores emerging alternatives, including in vitro testing, computer modeling, and organ-on-a-chip technology. It assesses the feasibility and effectiveness of these alternatives while delving into the ethical implications of transitioning away from traditional animal testing.

Exploring Alternatives

• In Vitro Testing: In vitro testing involves conducting experiments on isolated cells, tissues, or organs outside of a living organism. These systems allow researchers to assess the effects of drugs and chemicals on human cells, providing valuable insights into toxicity and efficacy. Organoids, which are three-dimensional cell cultures that mimic the structure and function of organs, are a notable advancement in in vitro testing (Clevers, 2016).
• Computer Modeling: Computational modeling leverages powerful computers to simulate biological processes and predict the effects of drugs and treatments. Techniques like molecular dynamics simulations and artificial intelligence-based algorithms have shown promise in drug discovery and toxicity assessment (Jin et al., 2017; Topol, 2019).
• Organ-on-a-Chip Technology: Organ-on-a-chip devices replicate the microenvironment of specific organs, allowing researchers to study their functions and responses to drugs in a controlled setting. These miniature systems offer the advantage of simulating human physiology more accurately than traditional animal models (Huh et al., 2011).

Assessing Feasibility and Effectiveness

While these alternatives hold great promise, their feasibility and effectiveness vary depending on the research objectives. In vitro models are excellent for high-throughput screening and toxicity testing but may lack the complexity of whole organisms. Computer modeling can expedite drug discovery and reduce the need for animal testing, but it relies on accurate data inputs and validated algorithms. Organ-on-a-chip technology is advancing rapidly but is still in the early stages of development for widespread use. Consequently, a combination of these alternatives may be required to fully replace animal testing in some contexts (Marx, 2019).

Ethical Implications of Transitioning Away from Animal Testing

Transitioning away from traditional animal testing raises ethical considerations as well. On one hand, reducing the use of animals aligns with ethical principles that prioritize animal welfare. However, there are concerns that the absence of animal models may lead to unforeseen risks in drug development and safety assessments. The potential for increased reliance on in vitro and computer-based models may also necessitate a reevaluation of how we ensure the safety and efficacy of medical interventions. Striking a balance between ethical imperatives and the need for rigorous scientific validation is an ongoing challenge, requiring careful consideration and ongoing refinement of alternative methodologies (Grimm et al., 2018).

As we explore these alternatives and grapple with their ethical implications, it becomes evident that the future of medical research lies in a hybrid approach that combines the strengths of traditional animal testing with innovative, animal-free methodologies to maximize scientific advancement while minimizing harm to animals.

VII. Challenges and Controversies

The use of animal testing in medical research is accompanied by a myriad of challenges and controversies that affect researchers, the scientific community, and public perception. This section explores the key challenges faced by researchers, controversies surrounding the necessity and validity of animal testing, and common public perceptions and misconceptions.

Challenges Faced by Researchers

• Ethical Dilemmas: Researchers often grapple with ethical concerns related to animal welfare. Balancing the pursuit of scientific knowledge with the moral imperative to minimize animal suffering can be a daunting challenge (Bateson, 2016).
• Scientific Validity: Ensuring that animal models accurately represent human biology and disease mechanisms is a persistent challenge. Differences between species can limit the translatability of research findings to humans (Perel et al., 2007).
• Reproducibility: Reproducibility issues in animal studies, such as inconsistent results between laboratories or difficulty replicating experiments, have raised concerns about the reliability of animal-based research (Festing et al., 2016).

Controversies Surrounding Necessity and Validity

• Necessity of Animal Testing: Controversy surrounds the perceived necessity of animal testing in the face of emerging alternatives. Some argue that animal testing is outdated and should be replaced entirely, while others maintain that it remains essential for scientific progress (Akhtar, 2015).
• Validity of Animal Models: Critics question the validity of animal models, pointing to instances where drugs deemed safe and effective in animal trials have failed in human clinical trials. This has led to debates about the predictive value of animal testing (Shanks & Greek, 2009).
• Transparency and Reporting: Concerns have arisen regarding transparency in animal research, including issues related to the selective reporting of results and potential bias in publications (Ioannidis, 2012).

Public Perceptions and Misconceptions

• Misconceptions About Alternatives: Public misconceptions about the availability and reliability of alternative methods can hinder informed discussions about the future of animal testing (Hobson-West, 2007).
• Media Influence: Media portrayal of animal testing, often highlighting controversies and ethical dilemmas, can contribute to public confusion and misconceptions (Hobson-West, 2010).
• Informed Advocacy: Public advocacy groups and individuals play a role in shaping perceptions and influencing policy decisions. However, advocacy efforts may sometimes be based on incomplete or biased information, impacting public discourse (Ormandy et al., 2019).

Navigating these challenges and controversies requires ongoing dialogue among researchers, ethicists, policymakers, and the public. Addressing concerns related to the ethics, validity, and necessity of animal testing while promoting transparency and communication is crucial for fostering a nuanced and informed approach to this complex issue. Ultimately, these discussions will shape the future of animal testing and its role in advancing medical science.

VIII. The Future of Animal Testing in Medical Research

The future of animal testing in medical research is marked by dynamic changes and evolving methodologies. This section explores emerging trends in animal testing, the potential for reducing and refining animal experimentation, and predictions regarding its future role in medical research.

Emerging Trends in Animal Testing Methodologies

• Advanced In Vitro Models: Technological advancements are enhancing the sophistication of in vitro models, making them more representative of human physiology. Miniature organ-on-a-chip devices, 3D cell cultures, and human tissue engineering techniques are gaining traction (Zhang et al., 2021).
• Precision Medicine and Personalized Models: The future of animal testing may involve the creation of personalized animal models, utilizing gene-editing technologies like CRISPR-Cas9 to tailor animal subjects to specific research questions (O’Geen et al., 2017).
• Integration of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence: Harnessing big data and artificial intelligence can improve the predictive accuracy of animal models and enable researchers to make more informed decisions about when and how to use animal testing (Bender et al., 2019).

The Potential for Reducing and Refining Animal Testing

• Reducing Animal Numbers: The “Reduction” principle of the Three Rs emphasizes minimizing the number of animals used in experiments. This involves employing statistical methods and innovative study design to maximize data obtained from each animal, reducing the overall number needed (Festing et al., 1998).
• Enhancing Ethical Treatment: Continuous efforts to refine experimental procedures and enhance the welfare of animals involved in testing aim to minimize suffering. Advancements in anesthesia, analgesia, and humane endpoints contribute to these refinements (Morton & Griffiths, 1985).
• Alternative Approaches: A transition toward alternative methodologies and a reduction in the use of animals in certain areas of research, such as toxicity testing, may become more pronounced as technologies like in vitro assays and computational modeling mature (Hartung, 2020).

Predictions Regarding the Future Role of Animal Testing

The future role of animal testing in medical research is likely to be characterized by a shift towards greater selectivity and refinement. While it is improbable that animal testing will be entirely replaced, its role may become more targeted and complementary to alternative methods. Researchers, ethicists, and policymakers are expected to continue collaborating to develop guidelines and regulations that prioritize the ethical treatment of animals and promote the use of alternative models when appropriate (Tannenbaum & Bennett, 2015).

As scientific knowledge expands and alternative technologies improve, the landscape of animal testing will evolve. Researchers will need to remain adaptable and open to new approaches that both advance medical science and respect ethical principles, ultimately working toward a future where animal testing is employed sparingly and only when essential to address pressing biomedical questions.

IX. Conclusion

In conclusion, this research paper has provided a comprehensive exploration of the multifaceted topic of animal testing in medical research. Throughout the paper, we have examined historical contexts, ethical considerations, significant medical breakthroughs, alternative methodologies, challenges, controversies, and the future of animal testing.

Our examination of historical contexts has revealed the long and storied history of animal testing, from its roots in ancient Greece to its pivotal role in modern medical research. Key milestones and developments underscored the indispensable contributions of animal testing to advancing our understanding of diseases and developing life-saving treatments.

Ethical considerations have highlighted the moral dilemmas that researchers face when using animals in experiments. The “Three Rs” framework has provided a guide for ethical animal research, emphasizing the reduction, refinement, and replacement of animal testing whenever feasible.

The section on medical breakthroughs has showcased how animal testing has been instrumental in transformative discoveries, such as the polio vaccine, insulin therapy, and advancements in cardiac surgery. These examples underscore the profound impact of animal testing on healthcare and public health.

We then explored alternative methodologies, including in vitro testing, computer modeling, and organ-on-a-chip technology, emphasizing their potential to reduce the reliance on traditional animal testing. Ethical implications of this transition were discussed, highlighting the need for a careful balance between scientific progress and animal welfare.

Challenges and controversies were examined, addressing issues like ethical dilemmas, scientific validity, and public perceptions. These challenges reflect the complex and evolving nature of the debate surrounding animal testing.

Looking to the future, emerging trends in animal testing methodologies, the potential for reducing and refining animal testing, and predictions regarding its future role have been discussed. It is evident that animal testing will continue to evolve, with greater emphasis on selectivity and refinement, complemented by advances in alternative methodologies.

In conclusion, animal testing remains a cornerstone of biomedical research, contributing significantly to medical breakthroughs while posing ethical dilemmas and challenges. As we move forward, it is imperative to strike a balance between scientific progress and ethical responsibility, embracing alternative methods and refining animal testing practices. The ongoing debate surrounding animal testing reflects our commitment to upholding both human health and the ethical treatment of animals. The future of medical research lies in a hybrid approach that maximizes scientific advancement while minimizing harm to animals, ensuring that we continue to push the boundaries of knowledge and innovation in the pursuit of better healthcare for all.

Bibliography

• Akhtar, A. (2015). The flaws and human harms of animal experimentation. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 24(4), 407-419.
• Animal Welfare Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 2131-2159 (1966).
• Bateson, P. (2016). When to experiment on animals. Nature, 531(7593), 135-136.
• Bender, A. et al. (2019). Applying big data in the laboratory. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 18(10), 731-733.
• Bliss, M. (1982). The Discovery of Insulin. University of Chicago Press.
• Clevers, H. (2016). Modeling Development and Disease with Organoids. Cell, 165(7), 1586-1597.
• Festing, M. F., & Wilkinson, R. (2007). The ethics of animal research: talking point on the use of animals in scientific research. EMBO Reports, 8(6), 526-530.
• Festing, M. F., et al. (2016). Reducing our irreproducibility. Nature, 534(7605), 27-29.
• Gibbon, J. H. (1954). Application of a mechanical heart and lung apparatus to cardiac surgery. Minnesota Medicine, 37(3), 171-185.
• Greek, R., & Greek, J. (2010). Is the use of sentient animals in basic research justifiable? Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 5(1), 14.
• Hartung, T. (2020). Look back in anger – what clinical studies tell us about preclinical work. ALTEX, 37(2), 223-237.
• Hobson-West, P. (2007). “Tragic butchery”: The rhetoric of animal experimentation. Society & Animals, 15(4), 351-374.
• Hobson-West, P. (2010). What kind of animal is the ‘three Rs’? Humanimalia, 2(2), 59-76.
• Huh, D., et al. (2011). Reconstituting organ-level lung functions on a chip. Science, 328(5986), 1662-1668.
• Ioannidis, J. P. (2012). Why science is not necessarily self-correcting. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 645-654.
• Jin, X., et al. (2017). Machine learning identifies stemness features associated with oncogenic dedifferentiation. Cell, 173(2), 338-354.
• Marx, U. (2019). Organ-on-a-chip systems: Enhancing predictive accuracy, reproducibility, and standardization. Stem Cell Reports, 12(6), 1023-1039.
• Morton, D. B., & Griffiths, P. H. (1985). Guidelines on the recognition of pain, distress and discomfort in experimental animals and an hypothesis for assessment. Veterinary Record, 116(16), 431-436.
• O’Geen, H., et al. (2017). CRISPR/Cas9‐mediated genome editing to treat diseases and disorders. American Journal of Human Genetics, 101(4), 590-602.
• Ormandy, E. H., et al. (2019). Public perceptions of animal experimentation across Europe. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 735-751.
• Perel, P., et al. (2007). Comparison of treatment effects between animal experiments and clinical trials: systematic review. BMJ, 334(7586), 197.
• Pound, P., & Bracken, M. B. (2014). Is animal research sufficiently evidence based to be a cornerstone of biomedical research? BMJ, 348, g3387.
• Public Health Service. (1986). Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare.
• Regan, T. (1983). The case for animal rights. University of California Press.
• Russell, W. M. S., & Burch, R. L. (1959). The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. Methuen.
• Sabin, A. B. (1956). Poliomyelitis vaccination. New England Journal of Medicine, 254(4), 158-161.
• Shampo, M. A., & Kyle, R. A. (2000). William Harvey and the circulation of the blood. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 75(4), 349.
• Shanks, N., & Greek, R. (2009). Animal Models in Light of Evolution. CRC Press.
• Swanson, L. W. (1994). Brain maps: Structure of the rat brain. Elsevier.
• Topol, E. J. (2019). High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 44-56.
• Weichbrod, R. H., et al. (2002). Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (8th ed.). National Academies Press.
• WHO (World Health Organization). (1985). Principles of Laboratory Animal Care. WHO Offset Publication, No. 99.
• WSPA (World Society for the Protection of Animals). (2011). Ethical Review in Practice: A Framework for Ethical Review of Animal Care and Use Programs and the Use of Animals in Research, Testing, and Education. WSPA International.

ORDER HIGH QUALITY CUSTOM PAPER

Animal Testing - Free Essay Samples And Topic Ideas

Animal testing, the use of non-human animals in experiments to assess the safety and efficacy of substances, evokes strong ethical debates. Essays on animal testing could explore the scientific, ethical, and legal aspects surrounding this practice. Discussions might delve into the necessity, alternatives, and the rights of animals versus the benefits to humanity. Moreover, analyzing the historical evolution of animal testing, the regulations governing it, and the public opinion and activism surrounding animal testing can provide a comprehensive understanding of the multifaceted issues involved in this contentious practice. A substantial compilation of free essay instances related to Animal Testing you can find at PapersOwl Website. You can use our samples for inspiration to write your own essay, research paper, or just to explore a new topic for yourself.

Why Animal Testing should be Banned

The ethical implications of animal testing have become increasingly significant in our modern society, where scientific advancement often comes at a devastating cost to animal welfare. While historically accepted as a necessary evil, mounting evidence suggests that animal testing should be banned due to its moral implications, questionable scientific validity, and the existence of alternative methods. This debate has gained renewed urgency as our understanding of animal consciousness and suffering has evolved. The Current State of Animal Testing Many organizations […]

Is Animal Testing Ethical

As medical and scientific research continues to advance, the question of 'is animal testing ethical' has become increasingly complex and contentious. While animal experimentation has historically contributed to numerous medical breakthroughs, this practice requires critical reassessment in light of modern technological alternatives and evolving understanding of animal consciousness. This essay argues that animal testing, though historically valuable, is becoming increasingly difficult to justify ethically and scientifically, given the emergence of more accurate, cost-effective, and humane alternatives. When examining whether is […]

Animal Cruelty: a Call for Global Awareness and Action

The definition of animal cruelty varies from person to person, and although it is occasionally discussed, many people tend to downplay its seriousness. Animal abuse manifests in numerous forms, including scientific research, abandonment, and mistreatment. These acts of cruelty should be universally condemned and banned because animals deserve the same basic rights as humans. This essay explores the various dimensions of animal cruelty, the underlying causes, and the urgent need for societal change to protect animal rights. Understanding the Forms […]

We will write an essay sample crafted to your needs.

Animal Testing is Unethical, Unreliable and Unnecessary

Every year, 100 million animals sit in U.S laboratories caged and waiting to be burned, abused, and infected (Madhusree 1). The test subjects have few rights, protective services, or liberties. The pictures of restrained tormented animals are hidden in a veil of secrecy amongst red lipsticks, sweetener packets, and paints. What the world desires carries a secret pain, and comes at a cost that often goes unnoticed. Despite the scientific advancements achieved through animal testing, scientists should resort to alternative […]

The Role of Animal Testing in Scientific Advancement

Animal testing, a controversial yet integral component of scientific research, has contributed significantly to medical advancements and our understanding of biological processes. Although some individuals argue that the ethical implications and potential harm to animals outweigh these benefits, it is crucial to explore the multifaceted nature of animal experimentation. This essay aims to present a comprehensive view of the significant contributions animal testing has made to science and medicine while acknowledging the ethical dilemmas it poses. By examining historical breakthroughs, […]

Reasons of Animal Cruelty

"The Humane Society of the United States estimates that nearly 1 million animals a year are abused or killed in episodes of domestic violence" (Rajewski). Animal abuse is referred to as an act of intentional mistreatment against animals and is inflicted by humans for reasons other than survival or self-defense. The topic of animal cruelty has been debated for an extremely long time, but nothing has changed for the past decade, and people continue to use violence against animals. It […]

The Ethical and Scientific Case against Animal Testing

A white bunny's soft fur and gentle demeanor evoke innocence, serving as a symbol of purity in many cultural narratives. The mere thought of causing harm to such a creature is unsettling. Yet, every day, countless animals, including rabbits, are subjected to painful experiments in laboratories across the world. While many companies claim to be cruelty-free, the reality of animal testing is often obscured from public view. This essay aims to delve into the complexities of animal testing, exploring the […]

Animal Cruelty Prevention Analysis

Animal cruelty is a profound issue that has permeated human society for centuries. Defined as the infliction of suffering or harm upon non-human animals, either by omission or commission, this cruelty manifests in various forms across the globe. The image of a car driving past a neglected, matted dog on a rainy street encapsulates the indifference that often accompanies animal abandonment. This essay explores the multifaceted nature of animal cruelty, examining its historical roots, contemporary issues, and the ongoing efforts […]

Medical Animal Testing: a Complex Debate

Passionate arguments both for and against medical animal testing highlight the complexity of this ethically charged practice.It raises significant ethical, scientific, and practical considerations. This essay aims to delve into the debate surrounding medical animal testing by examining the arguments for its prohibition due to the availability of humane alternatives, the limitations of animal models in accurately predicting human responses, and the potential risks associated with drugs that pass animal testing but fail in human trials. Furthermore, it will explore […]

Problems with Animal Testing: Inhumane Practices and Neglected Interests

Abstract The Animal Welfare Act (AWA), enacted in August 1966, regulates the treatment and care of animals in research (Murnaghan 4). However, researchers annually exploit approximately 26 million animals for scientific and commercial testing in the United States (The Flaws and Human Harms ). These exploitations occur while developing medical treatments, determining toxicity levels in medicine, and ensuring the safety of cosmetic products prior to human utilization. While conducting a study on animal welfare, the United States Department of Agriculture […]

The Ethical Dilemma of Animal Testing

Animal testing in the pursuit of product safety and efficacy remains a contentious issue that continues to spark debate worldwide. Companies often test their products on animals to ensure safety for human use, but this practice raises significant ethical concerns. Many consumers remain oblivious to the harsh realities animals endure during these tests, perpetuating a cycle of ignorance and consumption. As products are revised and new items are developed, the demand for animal testing persists, benefiting companies at the expense […]

The Cruelty in Animal Testing

Every year in the United States, it is estimated that tens of millions of animals are used for research and testing purposes (Animal Experimentation 50). These animals are usually mice, rats, rabbits, fish, guinea pigs, non-human primates, and other farm animals. Test animals undergo testing for cosmetics and household products, trials for new medicines, and scientific experiments. These tests and experiments are uncomfortable and often painful for the animals. The United States has laws to protect animals, but there are […]

Scientific Ethics in Animal Testing Research

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, established by the United Nations, enshrines the rights to life, liberty, and security for all human beings, protecting them from cruelty, slavery, and torture. These rights, inherent by law, have sparked a parallel debate regarding whether animals also possess moral rights that should be acknowledged and safeguarded by human society. This debate carries significant practical implications: if animals are entitled to life, they should not be killed; if they have the right to liberty, […]

Animal Testing and its Importance

From over-the-counter medicine to the shampoo we use, it's easy to forget how relatively easy our lives have become with the many commodities available to us today. What we do not often consider is how these privileges came to be. What we do not think about is the prevalence of animal testing behind many necessary medicines and products. While controversial, the age-old practice of using animals for scientific and commercial testing has no doubt made many invaluable contributions to our […]

New and Safe Treatments for Humanity

Animal testing has long been a means to discover new and safe treatments for humanity. Modern medicines and innovations are constantly being created and updated, creating an ongoing need for ways to test them. There have been many different methods of testing throughout history. By the Roman era, dissection and vivisection (the dissection of live animals) were established scientific practices (Fellenz 72). That was a more official part of animal testing history. Although not technically experimenting, people learned how animal […]

Effectiveness of Animal Testing

For Centuries animals have been tested on for research all across the globe. These animals can range from elephants to mice and can have an age range from new-borne to oldest surviving. The oldest form of animal testing has been dated back to around 199-217 AD. That's before the time of some of the earths early great scientists and researchers like Aristotle and Erasistratus. It is still as important today because of how much information we can actually gain from […]

Ending Animal Testing: Ethical, Economic, and Scientific Perspectives

Today, the use of animal testing in the production and development of various consumer products, including makeup items such as eyeliner and lipstick, raises significant ethical concerns. Around the United States and across the globe, defenseless animals are subjected to experimentation, often in ways that are both cruel and unnecessary. Despite the growing awareness, animal abuse remains a problem that is frequently overlooked, largely because the general public is not fully informed about the kind of abuse that farm animals, […]

Alternatives to Animal Testing: a Glimpse into the Innovative and Compassionate Future of Scientific Research

Let's chat about something. You’ve probably heard whispers of testing stuff on animals. Whether you're in camp "necessary evil" or team "save the bunnies," there's some pretty snazzy news. We've got alternative methods bubbling up, blowing our minds. Scientists have found a way to grow miniature human organs in labs. Imagine a teensy liver or a bite-sized brain being used to check if that new face cream is safe. It’s all about getting results without making Fido or Thumper shed […]

The Integral Role of Animal Testing in Medical Advancements

Animal testing has been a cornerstone of medical research for centuries, playing an indispensable role in the development of vaccines and treatments that have saved countless lives. From the eradication of smallpox to the breakthrough discovery of insulin, research involving animals has paved the way for monumental medical advancements. In this essay, I will argue that animal testing has been crucial not only for human health but also for veterinary medicine. By examining the historical context and current applications of […]

The Ethics of Animal Testing: a Utilitarian Perspective

Animal testing has long been a topic of ethical debate, drawing attention from philosophers, scientists, and the general public alike. This practice involves conducting experiments and research on various animals, such as mice, rabbits, and pigs, to ascertain the safety and effectiveness of products intended for human use, including medicines, cosmetics, and food. While animal testing plays a pivotal role in scientific advancements, it raises significant ethical concerns due to the potential harm and distress it causes to the animals […]

The Study on Animal Experimentation

Animal testing has been a severe problem that still has not been resolved. Animal testing should be stopped for the safety of animals and human, but since it cannot be, how can it be improved? Many scientists rely on animal testing to collect data on safety and efficacy from experiments. They use animals to test products like food, drugs, cosmetics, medicines, and chemicals. They use animals because animals serve to protect consumers, workers and the environment from the harmful effects […]

What is Animal Cruelty?

Animal cruelty is the act of humans inflicting harm and suffering onto an animal. This can include neglect, animal fighting, and overt abuse. In the United States, an animal is abused every ten seconds. Animal protection organizations are working to stop animal cruelty everywhere. Many of these organizations believe in animal rights and animal welfare. Animal rights activists usually go to the extremes, and will even break laws to make a statement to the public. One point of contention for […]

The Ethical and Practical Drawbacks of Animal Testing

Animal experimentation has remained a contentious subject, evoking substantial moral, scientific, and pragmatic considerations. Despite its historical contributions to medical and scientific progress, the deficiencies inherent in employing animals for investigative purposes are significant and warrant careful scrutiny. The ethical quandaries, compounded by uncertainties regarding the reliability and indispensability of such assessments, necessitate meticulous evaluation. Foremost among the concerns surrounding animal testing is the ethical conundrum it engenders. Numerous experiments entail procedures that inflict anguish, torment, and enduring detriment upon […]

The Legal Status of Animal Testing: Ethical Considerations and Global Perspectives

In the intricate interplay between ethical responsibilities and scientific advancement, few topics evoke as much deliberation and introspection as the legal framework surrounding animal testing. This contentious issue serves as an arena where the noble endeavor of promoting human health clashes with the moral obligation to safeguard animal well-being. Exploring the legal frameworks, ethical considerations, and global viewpoints enveloping this intricate subject unveils a diverse tapestry of conflicting perspectives and evolving attitudes. At the heart of the debate lies the […]

How To Write an Essay About Animal Testing

Introduction to the topic of animal testing.

When embarking on an essay about animal testing, it is essential to begin by defining what animal testing encompasses and the contexts in which it is used. This includes its application in medical research, cosmetics testing, and other scientific endeavors. In your introduction, outline the scope of the debate, which often centers around ethical considerations, scientific necessity, and the pursuit of medical advancements. Acknowledge the complexity of the topic, which involves balancing the welfare of animals with potential human benefits. This introductory section should set the stage for a thoughtful exploration of the multifaceted issues surrounding animal testing.

Delving into Ethical and Scientific Perspectives

The body of your essay should delve into the various ethical and scientific perspectives surrounding animal testing. One key aspect to explore is the ethical debate, which includes arguments about animal rights, suffering, and the moral implications of using animals for human benefit. On the scientific side, discuss the role of animal testing in medical breakthroughs and the question of its necessity and effectiveness. It's important to consider both sides of the argument, providing a balanced view that includes the advancements made possible by animal testing, as well as the ethical dilemmas it raises. Use evidence such as scientific data, ethical theories, and regulatory policies to support your points.

Analyzing Alternatives and Societal Impacts

In this section, focus on the alternatives to animal testing and the potential impacts of these methods on society and scientific research. Discuss advancements in technology, such as computer modeling and cell-based assays, and how they offer potential replacements or reductions in animal use. Analyze how these alternatives could change the landscape of research and testing, considering both the benefits and limitations. Also, consider the societal implications of animal testing, including public opinion, regulatory changes, and the role of advocacy groups. This part of your essay should highlight the evolving nature of the debate and the future possibilities for both scientific research and animal welfare.

Concluding the Discussion

Conclude your essay by summarizing the main arguments and reflecting on the ongoing debate surrounding animal testing. This is an opportunity to reiterate the complexity of the issue and the importance of continuing to balance ethical considerations with scientific progress. Consider the future of animal testing and the role of evolving ethical standards and scientific advancements in shaping this area. A strong conclusion will not only wrap up your essay but also encourage further thought and discussion about the ethical and scientific dimensions of animal testing.

1. Tell Us Your Requirements

2. Pick your perfect writer

3. Get Your Paper and Pay

Hi! I'm Amy, your personal assistant!

Don't know where to start? Give me your paper requirements and I connect you to an academic expert.

short deadlines

100% Plagiarism-Free

Certified writers

• The Use of Animals in Laboratory Research Words: 1395
• The Use of Animals in Scientific Research Words: 1117
• The Use of Animals in Biomedical Research Words: 1448
• Should Animals Be Used for Research? Words: 1977
• Animal Testing: Use of Animal in Biomedical Research Words: 2138
• Ethics of Using Animals in Medical Research Words: 559
• Should Animals Be Used in Medical Research? Words: 2144
• Ethics of Using Animals in Medical Researches Words: 836
• Research Involving Animals: The Animal Rights Debate Words: 1918
• Animal Use in Biomedical Research: Ethical Debates and Scientific Justifications Words: 2711
• Animal Testing in the Modern World Words: 1734
• Is Animal Testing Ethical: Essay Example Words: 1655
• Ethical Considerations and Applications of Animals in Laboratory Research Words: 781
• Animal Testing: Evaluation, Prediction and Risk Words: 1605
• Animals Should Have the Same Rights as Humans: Pros and Cons Words: 2116
• Ethics of Using Animals in Medical Research: A Christian Perspective Words: 846
• Animals Should Be Used for Research Words: 316
• Animal Testing: Benefits and Disadvantages Words: 5314
• Ethical Issues in Animal Research Words: 584
• The Ethical Side of Animal Testing Words: 1151

Using Animals in Medical Research

Introduction, it is unethical to use animals for research.

The use of animals for medical research has generated heated debate in recent times where certain quarters in society support the use of animals for research while others don’t. It is evident that the use of animals for research has enabled tremendous steps in the field of medicine that have helped mankind solve most of his health problems (Trull, 2005). Examples of such benefits include the discovery of many antibiotics, vaccines, the development of chemotherapies for the treatment of cancer problems, erythroproteins used in the treatment of several renal and anemia cases among other procedures that have been successfully implemented to solve most of the human suffering as far as health is concerned. According to Luedke (2000), without using animals for research, man could be suffering more as a result of health problems.

The use of animals for carrying out research has been applied while following ethical practices. Carefully controlled and monitored procedures are followed while using animals for research thus total suffering of the animal is reduced. In addition, as Luedke (2005) suggests, the research procedure is such that, after the study is approved using animals it is carried out on human beings. In doing so the human being used in the research gives out their consent that means that they agree to be used for the study. This makes a difference while using animals in that it is impossible to obtain the consent of the animals. This is not different from most of the activities that involve a human-animal relationship. Even in situations where human is kind to the animals, he does not obtain the consent from the animal. As long as using animals in research is morally acceptable in society, scientists should use them in an ethical manner in carrying out the research to benefit mankind.

A lot of evidence can be cited that places humans above other living things both in the universe origin theories and also in real-life experiences. Human being has for a long time controlled other living things including animals. Supporting the views of Aristotle as expressed by Gargaro (1991), that “nature is a hierarchy in which those with a less reasoning ability exist for the sake of those with a higher reasoning ability” this suggests that animals exist for the sake of humans while plants exist for the sake of animals. The views of Aristotle apply not only to the interspecies relationships but also to the intra- species relationships. For example, the situation where fewer reasoning humans are utilized by more powerful humans as slaves.

Those that oppose the use of animals for research argue that animals are exposed to a lot of suffering and also that, there are other better alternatives to the use of animals for research. If such an argument is followed then a lot of other issues that involve man and animals should be raising such kind of debate. What about slaughtering the animal for food? Using animals for traveling and carrying goods? In all these cases, animals suffer for the benefit of a human being. Therefore, the argument on the basis of causing animals suffering is uncalled for and inappropriate. Thus if it is morally acceptable to consume meat for food, likewise it is acceptable to use animals for research in the quest of alienating greater human suffering.

According to Sharp (2004), it has been recognized that, animals like human have psychological experiences including pain. Thus if it is morally unacceptable to treat fellow human in a manner that disrespects them similarly, it is not morally acceptable to treat animals differently given that they have similar psychological experiences. While performing such procedures on animals it amounts to some kind of a form of “speciesicm” i.e. treating a certain species differently just because members belong to that species. Supporting the arguments of Sharp (2004), animals have cognitive faculties that are connected with other members of the moral and ethical community. Treating animals differently from members of other species for the benefit of one species can only be supported if an establishment is reached showing that animals lack some capacities that members of other species posses.

Beyond reasonable doubt, animals feel anger, fear, pleasure and pain. The same experiences are felt by human being. Thus morally they are equal by the fact that both share these encounters. By avoiding the physical pain that may result when animals are used for research it does not mean that animals are being treated equally with humans but it means that the interests of both are taken into consideration.

The reason why animal rights movements advocate for total abolition of the use of animals for research is the fact that many procedures carried out on animals during research are painful, and thus causes suffering to the animals.

According to Gargaro (1991) while advocating for the use of animals for research, it gives an implication that, man is free to harm or abuse animals or that man is not obliged to care for animal suffering.

When I defend the notion of using animals for experimentation with humane, does not mean that I completely oppose the use of animals by human beings. My argument is that, the use of animals should be implemented with great caution of respect. For example, no animal should be used for experimentation without using the pain relieving anesthesia. On the other hand, some products that have been tested on animals do not have advantageous use on humans. Therefore such experimentation that implicates no significant benefits to either human or animals should not be carried out.

When animals are used, most of the times, they are used, they have to be removed from their natural habitat to an artificial environment for example in the laboratory. This can be regarded as cruelty of the highest order and does not show respect to the animals despite the experiments carried on he animal being beneficial to the human being. These views have been highly supported by Gargaro (1991) where he opposes the deliberate eviction of animals from their natural habitat which is different from when animals are evicted from the environment by natural means like hunting or natural calamities. In addition, man accelerates endangering some animal species by using them for research without putting into consideration their overall population and the degree with which they are endangered.

Researchers sometimes fail in their missions by using animals in developing or experimenting on human medicine. Some examples of this are during the research on polio where, results that were obtained on animals were misleading. About Peta (2009) Human being has therefore unnecessarily used animals to carry out research that yielded negative results. It therefore causes animals being used unnecessary suffering by being used for such experimentation. This implies that it is certainly possible to find other methods of research and experimentation that would give probably better results that using animals as specimens. A lot of animal lives would be saved if such other methods are implemented. The result of some experiments carried by using animals for test has produced drugs that have in some cases been recalled from public consumption as a result of negative effects or dismal performance. An example of such kind of a drug is the Rezulin that was used for curing diabetes and was abolished due to the fact that it caused liver failure. Another example is Lonronex that was produced for treatment of bowel-syndrome that was abolished due to its effects in causing fatal constipation and colitis. About Peta (2009), the above indication means that it is not animal experimentation method only that can be used to produce results that are beneficial to human. Thus other methods can probably yield better results that lead to animals not be unnecessarily exposed to suffering and risk but also human realizes the best remedy for health problems.

Any human activities are assessed of their benefits by comparing the positive impacts they accrue to his well being and the negative impacts it may cause to his life. It is evident that man has controlled most of the undertakings in the world as a superior species. Man has applied his senses to formulate means and methods that aim at fostering greater comfort in his life. This includes using animals for experimentation and research while finding the solution to most of the cure of his health problems. In addition, man has applied animals in research in finding most of the cure for animals.

Man has been endowed with brains unlike animals and at no instance will an animal embark on finding the cure for neither the sufferings of mankind nor that of other animals. In today’s world, almost all activities of animals have been significantly affected by human activities that aim at benefiting both the animals as well as the human. According to Prater (2002) although animals are used in carrying out research involving human medicine, there are some rules and regulations that are formulated and enforced by regulatory agencies in order to ensure proper care, handling and pain management of the animals being used for research., therefore, the aspect of respect to the animal life is well taken care of. It is also indicated that, research procedure is such that, tests are first carried out on cells, then to small animals like rodents, then to bigger animals like dogs and monkeys before being tested on the human being. This does not mean that the animals have a lesser life than the human but this is the most practical procedure that is possible to give results. In addition, every due procedure is followed in approving drugs and chemicals, selection of the animal as well as the procedures to use. Also, the way the animals to be used for experimentation are reared and prepared follows all the regulations of health, breeding, and feeding. Thus, while I support the views of Prater (2002) allowing research using animals does not mean allowing all experiments during research.

According to Festing and Robin (2007) any responsible scientist utilize animals for their research work by causing minimum or as little suffering as possible. The bioscience community gives a more general consensus that animals should be used for research and experimentation only within an ethical framework. Rather than abolish the use of animals for research, some laws and regulations should be formulated to give an appropriate ethical framework that governs the procedures of using animals in research work involving human medicine. An example of these regulations is those enacted in 1998 in UK. This regulations aim at ensuring that good animal welfare and humane science by making sure that utilization of animals for research at the designated establishment is justified.

The use of animals for research is supported by a vast majority of people in the world. It is reported that, in 1999 approximately 84% of the people surveyed endorsed the use of animals for research work. Also 90% and 89% of peoples interviewed in 2002 and 2005 respectively supported gave similar indications. In giving out their views people felt that before animals are considered for any research work, other options should be considered first and that animals should be utilized incase there are no other appropriate alternative (Festing and Robin, 2007).

Despite the negatives of use of animals in research work involving human medicine, a lot of positive feedback has been realized that have enables serious human health problems be alleviated for good or appropriately managed.

The suffering that animals endure in research procedures involving human medicine, contributes so much to the alleviation of human suffering. Appropriate regulations should be put in place to govern research involving animals. Researchers who fail to comply with the regulations should face the full legal implications. Animals can however be used in research work in procedures that are ethically and morally justified. This is through formulating regulations that aim at reducing overall animal suffering in research work. This should go in line with reducing the number of animals that are utilized for experimentation.

Opposition being felt by some groups is a way of expressing their democratic right of free expression of their views concerning the issue. However, unless completely impossible other methods of the undertaking the research other than using animals should be implemented.

Festing, S., & Robin, W. (2007). The ethics of animal research. Talking Point on the use of animals in scientific research. Web.

Gargaro, C. (1991). Animals Used for Medical Research: A Philosophical Viewpoint. Web.

Luedke, D. (2000). Animals & research part4: ethics of using animals in research. Hearst Seattle Media. Web.

Peta. (2009). Animals Used for Experimentation FAQs. PETA. Web.

Prater, M. (2002). Should animals be used for experimentation? Web.

Sharp, R. (2004). Ethical Issues in the Use of Animals in Biomedical Research. Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy Baylor College of Medicine. Web.

Trull, F. (2005). The Essential Need for Animals in Medical Research. Web.

Cite this paper

• Chicago (N-B)
• Chicago (A-D)

StudyCorgi. (2021, November 23). Using Animals in Medical Research. https://studycorgi.com/using-animals-in-medical-research/

"Using Animals in Medical Research." StudyCorgi , 23 Nov. 2021, studycorgi.com/using-animals-in-medical-research/.

StudyCorgi . (2021) 'Using Animals in Medical Research'. 23 November.

1. StudyCorgi . "Using Animals in Medical Research." November 23, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/using-animals-in-medical-research/.

Bibliography

StudyCorgi . "Using Animals in Medical Research." November 23, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/using-animals-in-medical-research/.

StudyCorgi . 2021. "Using Animals in Medical Research." November 23, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/using-animals-in-medical-research/.

This paper, “Using Animals in Medical Research”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: November 23, 2021 .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal . Please use the “ Donate your paper ” form to submit an essay.

• Should Animals Be Used in Medical Research?
• Should animals be used for scientific research?
• Experimentation on Animals
• Using Animals for Research
• The Debate About Animal Rights
• Animal Testing: Why It Is Still Being Used
• Animal Testing and Ethics
• Animal Testing: Ethical Dilemmas in Business
• Organizations Campaigning Against the Use of Animals in Research
• The Benefits of Animals to Humans Essay

Should Animals be Used in Research: Argumentative Essay

Should animals be used in research? This argumentative essay aims to answer the question. It focuses on pros and cons of animal testing for scientific and medical goals.

Introduction

• The Arguments

Works Cited

All over the world, animal activists and institutions have argued whether or not research should be used on animals or should be outlawed. Philosophers believe that experiments on animals are not morally justified because they cause pain or harm the animals. A group of these philosophers believe that other alternatives are available, thus they claim that because we have other alternatives, the use of animals in research should be outlawed.

Should Animals Be Used in Research? The Arguments

In my opinion, I support the line of argument that animals should not be used in research. Since the discovery of knowing through science (research), the use of animals in research has elicited mixed reactions among different scholars. Philosophers are against the idea citing the availability of other options for toxicological tests on animals and the harsh treatments the scientists have accorded these animals in the medical tests. Unless scientists discover other ways of testing medicines, I think tests on animals are unethical.

Scientists use these creatures to validate a theory and then revise or change their theories depending on the new facts or information gained from every test performed. Animal rights lobby groups believe that animals are used for no reasons in these experiments as the animals endure pain inflicted on them during these tests (Singer 2). They tend to overlook the fact that animals have moral existence, social and religious values. Thousands of animals on this planet contribute largely to the aesthetic appeal of the land.

On the other hand, scientists only see the positive contributions of animal tests to the medical field and ignore the side effects of the tests on the animals’ lives. They overlook the idea that animals are hurt and thus suffer tremendously.

To them the impact of the research on the lives of their families and friends by coming up with vaccines and drugs is the inspiration. Research on animals should be banned because it inflicts pain, harms the culprits and morally it is unjustified. Has man ever wondered whether or not animals feel similar pain that humans feel? (Singer 2).

Human beings know very well that they themselves feel pain. For example, you will know that a metal rod is hot by touching it with bare hands. It is believed that pain is mental; in other words it cannot be seen. We feel pain and we realize that other creatures also feel pain from observations like jerking away from an event or even yelling.

Since the reactions are the same as those of man, philosophers say that animals feel similar pain just like humans. Animal activists reaffirm that the major undoing of tests involving animals is the manner in which the animals are treated arguing that anesthesia for suppressing the pain is never used.

However, as many people are opposed to the use of animals in research, many lives have been saved every year due to their death. I think that instead of refuting that taking away the life of a rat is unethical, harms the animal; I believe it is a bold step in improving the welfare of millions of people for thousands of years to come. Tests on animals are the most common toxicological tests used by scientists; the findings help to better lives for hundreds of people across the universe (Fox 12).

Fox, Michael A. The Case for Animal Experimentation. California: University of California Press, 1986.

Singer, Peter. Animal Liberation. New York: Random House, 1975.

• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2018, December 27). Should Animals be Used in Research: Argumentative Essay. https://ivypanda.com/essays/should-animals-be-used-in-research/

"Should Animals be Used in Research: Argumentative Essay." IvyPanda , 27 Dec. 2018, ivypanda.com/essays/should-animals-be-used-in-research/.

IvyPanda . (2018) 'Should Animals be Used in Research: Argumentative Essay'. 27 December.

IvyPanda . 2018. "Should Animals be Used in Research: Argumentative Essay." December 27, 2018. https://ivypanda.com/essays/should-animals-be-used-in-research/.

1. IvyPanda . "Should Animals be Used in Research: Argumentative Essay." December 27, 2018. https://ivypanda.com/essays/should-animals-be-used-in-research/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Should Animals be Used in Research: Argumentative Essay." December 27, 2018. https://ivypanda.com/essays/should-animals-be-used-in-research/.

• To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
• As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
• As a template for you assignment

Animal Testing In Medical Research Essay

Show More Animal research has aided in the advancement of research done in the medical field. Animal research has helped scientists better understand treatment options when it comes to cancer, HIV/AIDS, heart disease/stroke, diabetes, high blood pressure, Alzheimer’s Disease, Parkinson’s Disease, Hepatitis C, birth defects, epilepsy, spinal cord injuries, and cystic fibrosis. Despite the controversy of testing on animals, I do think that testing on animals is beneficial in the advancement in the health of humans. However, it is necessary that within animal research scientists follow strict ethical guidelines making sure that all testing on animals is justified in bettering humans, and that all animals are treated in a humane way. Following are examples of how animal testing has bettered the medical field by helping researchers better understand different diseases and effective treatment options. One of the advancements …show more content… Not only does diabetes impact humans but it has also been found in cats and dogs. There are several different treatments and medicines available for diabetes, and over the years there have been many advancements. Some available medicines and treatments include, quick-acting and long-acting insulin, islet transplantation for Type I diabetes, as well as, different drugs to help people with Type II diabetes manage symptoms from the disease (Americans For Medical Progress, n.a.). Dogs were crucial to the research that identified the cause of diabetes, which later led to the development of insulin (AALAS Foundation, 2015). Research is still continuing to be done to help diminish side affects that are causing complications in some of these methods of treatment and medicine . Also, researchers have developed insulin pumps that they hope to replace injections with. There hope is to possibly find a cure to diabetes (AALAS Foundation,

Related Documents

Biomedica trull animal testing essay.

As he backed himself into the corner of the cage, fear penetrated the little guinea pig’s eyes while he watched the man carrying a scary needle closer to him. Now imagine that little guinea pig being your pet. Being a pet owner, you can tell when your pet is sad, happy, or not acting like themselves. Thinking about that, I picture my guinea pig in a scary room with strangers who continuously do tests on him and that is truly terrifying. There are many questions about animal testing.…

Animal Cruelty Or Vital Aspect To Medical Advancement?

Before insulin’s clinical use, a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus meant death. There are currently 25.8 million children and adults in the Untied States, that is 8.3 % of the population, who have diabetes. (American Diabetes Association) But thanks to the discovery of insulin through animal testing 25.8 million people in America have a chance to sustain their…

The Pros And Cons Of Biomedical Research

Animal research does not only benefit humans, it also benefits the animals. Animals have improved healthcare and this era’s lifespan. Farm animals, household pets, wild species and endangered species are all benefiting from the research conducted through animals. There are vaccines for rabies, distemper, tetanus, parvo virus and numerous other illnesses in cats, dogs and all other species. Within our society, all animals and humans were saved by the testing…

Animal Testing Satire

The California Biomedical Research Association addresses that “nearly every medical breakthrough in the last 100 years has resulted directly from research using animals”. Many of the scientific discoveries have saved countless human lives, not to mention the great deal of scientific research available to diabetic humans due to animals. Even vaccines like the Polio vaccine, which has saved 350,000 people from contracting polio, has been tested on animals. Without animal testing, humans wouldn’t be as advanced in the medical field as they are…

Why Do I Choose Insulin?

Frederick Banting and Charles Best would then later do an experiment on another dog, this time, they surgically ligated the dog 's pancreas and this put a halt to the flow of nourishment in order for the pancreas to deteriorate. Following some time they would later extract the pancreas, cut it into portions and froze the portions in a combination of water and salts. When the portions were partially frozen, they were ground up and filtered. The confined substance was labelled as isletin. The extract was later inserted into the dog that was diabetic as a result of this the dog 's blood glucose level decreased and the dog was visibly in good condition and was not weak anymore.…

Animal Testing Necessary Essay

Approximately 92% of experimental drugs that are safe and effective in animals eventually fail in human trials because they end up not working or are too dangerous. That begs the question whether or not animal testing is a necessary practice. If the product is going to go to human trial anyways, why not start there? Although some may argue that put people’s lives in danger, but that is what volunteers are for. As well as having volunteers there are also people who are in prison for heinous crimes that could be used to be tested on.…

Synthesis Essay On Animal Testing

Unfortunately, the same can't be said for medical animal testing. In order to maintain progress; there must be sacrifice. The usage of animal testing has spurred many medical procedures. With regards to medical procedures, animal testing has resulted in major ones. Operations like blood transfusions, kidney dialysis, the use of the heart-lung machine, replacement heart valves, coronary bypass operations, heart transplants, and CT scanning resulted from animal testing and have brought new life to the inner organs.…

Symptoms And Prevention Of Type 2 Diabetes

New technology and medications to combat insulin resistance and help patients regulate blood. Glucose, evaluated through clinical trials, prevention and reversal of diabetes complication through an eye, kidney and vascular cell biology research. Often, type 2 tied to people who are overweight, with a sedentary lifestyle. Treatment focuses on diet and exercise. If blood sugar levels are still high, oral medications are used to help the body use its own insulin more efficiently.…

Type 1 Diabetes Type 2 Essay

Type One diabetes can affect children and adults at any age, and is affected by both environmental and genetic factors. This type of diabetes has nothing to do with diets or lifestyle choices, and cannot be prevented. This disease’s onset is quite immediate, and forces the person to rely on insulin pumps or injections to function properly. If balance of insulin is not perfect, the patient could die or have other serious health…

Type 1 Diabetic Research Paper

In the United States, 80 people are diagnosed with Type 1 Diabetes every day (“About Us”). The disease is the result of the autoimmune destruction of insulin-producing cells in the pancreas(“Gene Therapy for…”). The pancreas can no longer produce insulin to respond to glucose; this means the glucose can no longer be used for energy, and the person experiences irregular glucose levels (Schneider). There is no cure. Insulin injections are the only effective treatment, and they must be given multiple times per day.…

How Does Diabetes Affect The Human Body

However, diabetes requires a huge commitment. It is not something that a person should be careless about. Each type of diabetes is different and similar in its own way; therefore, treatments differ from each type. The main factor for treatments for all types of diabetes is to help the patient live a healthy life. The types of medications you have are oral and injected medications.…

The Medicines Patent Pool

Since the groundbreaking discovery in the early 20th century that insulin (the hormone that helps to control blood glucose levels in diabetics) could effectively manage blood sugar, diabetics around the world have been able to avoid what used to be a death sentence. However, as time progresses a vast amount of diabetics are finding themselves faced with declining health, risk of disease, amputation, and placing financial burden on family and/or society, largely due to the ever increasing price of both short and long acting insulin. Interestingly enough, this wasn't always the case, mostly due to the fact that insulin was derived from cattle and pig pancreas extract. Obtaining insulin for injection via animals was initially quite inexpensive,…

Invention Of Insulin

Along with medicines and gene therapies, insulin injections are also being used to control diabetes and have safeguarded millions of lives from dying.…

Glucagon And Insulin Essay

Type 2 diabetes is the highest growing type of diabetes around the globe and isn’t decreasing anytime soon. The US has the highest rate of diabetics in the world with about 23.6 million Americans having diabetes already and 79 million having pre-diabetic symptoms. Of those 23.6 million, 90 percent of them are type 2 diabetics (Imus 2011). A study from 2006 showed the US having 21 million diagnosed and 42 million with pre-diabetic symptoms (Daniels 2006). As of now the rate is 1 in 10 adults have diabetes type 2 and in the next 40 years it will most likely become 1 in 3.…

Animal Testing Vs Animal Research Essay

Some people claim that animal research is necessary because there are no alternatives. According to ¨Why are animals used in research,¨ animals are the best subject to research on because they are usually more reliable and they precise. The same source also claimed that animals are better than other subjects because they have a lot in common with humans and are the closest things we can get to exact replicas. Although animals are similar to humans, we do have many other ways that can be more accurate, cost and time efficient, and also environment friendly.…

Related Topics

• Animal testing
• Scientific method

Ready To Get Started?

• Create Flashcards
• Mobile apps
•   Facebook
•   Twitter
• Cookie Settings

We use cookies to enhance our website for you. Proceed if you agree to this policy or learn more about it.

• Essay Database >
• Essay Examples >
• Essays Topics >
• Essay on Animals

Expertly Crafted Essay On Animal Testing For Medical Research

Type of paper: Essay

Topic: Animals , Animal , Print , Pain , Testing , Medicine , Europe , Animal Testing

Words: 1400

Published: 03/08/2023

ORDER PAPER LIKE THIS

Today, it is estimated that more than twenty-six million animals are being used yearly in the United States for both scientific and commercial research, as they are used in the development of medical treatments, determining of toxic medicines and analyse how safe are products designed for people use among many others. According to Langley et al., “the issue with animal research has been in practice since 500 BC as those who agree with the issue testifying on how it has been of help in developing plenty life-saving medicines for both human beings and animals (270)”. According to the proposers of the animal research issue, there are alternate ways of carrying out complete research on living organisms and that the strict outlaid rules ensure the animals are not mistreated while in laboratories. However, those opposing the use of animals in carrying out research claim that the process is cruel and that scientists should try and use the alternative means that they have. Additionally, the feel that animals are different creatures from humans; hence, research conducted on animals is always inconclusive as it produces irrelevant results. In view of the two groups, it is clear that the use of animals in carrying out research by scientists is a necessary evil because it is through such researches that life-saving treatments have been developed. Even though scenarios to do with animal testing seemed to have existed before the nineteenth century, they appear to not having been documented clearly, but a clear documentation of animal testing occurred at the end of the 19th century when Louis Pasteur injected anthrax to a sheep and demonstrated the significance of vaccines using his germ theory. Additionally, the evolutionary theory of Charles Darwin of the year 1850 also showed that the use of animals in research offered an efficient means of comprehending the biological nature of humans (Jones and Greek 492). The use of animals for research therefore progressed and in research society defence meeting in the early 70s, Medawar gave a statement that predicted the practice to stabilise in the early 80s (Martins and Franco 318). In that “the use of animals in conducting research was not a permanent practice and its peak will be attained in ten years bearing in mind that testing on animals was the only means to get the knowledge needed and to pave the way for their dispensation in the use in research” (Medewar, 338). The above statement was confirmed in the early eighties by a figure that was produced by United Kingdom specialists considering that the number of animals that were being used had stabilized at five and a half million per year. Therefore, the 1980s marked the peak of using animals to carry out research after which the use of animals in testing reduced significantly, as researchers went on to predict a further reduction and even the development of alternative methods. Earlier, it was believed that animals did not feel the same measure of pain as compared to human beings because of their inability to be conscious. According to Bernard Rollin, “researchers were not sure in the early 1980’s on whether animals felt pain and veterinary doctors who went to college in the United States before 1989 were instructed to ignore animal pain” (Wever et al. 15). The 1980s also marked the passing of laws regarding research on animals with the example of the principally the degree of October 1980 in France where the legislative body that made it a mandatory for researchers to obtain project and institutional license before carrying out tests on vertebrates. Additionally, the European Union passed a Directive 86/609/EEC that was supposed to be followed by member countries in the manner in which they conducted research on animals, even though it displayed a substantial difference in the way in which member countries decided to exercise the directive. The 1990s saw an increased implementation of government regulations to regulate the use of animals in conducting research as compared to how things were the previous decade because researchers were required to obtain scientific approval in addition to many governmental approvals. Additionally, the Cork illustrated the manner in which the process of animals’ research became sophisticated where “scientists were getting the maximum variations of results from the smallest number of animals and issues to do with pain was to be researched to make sure that there were no alternatives that existed” (Verrinder, Ostini, and Phillips 12). However, the claim that the use of animals in conducting research had reduced was disputed by animal rights organisation, which claimed the practice was still being widely practised as shown by California data. In that, the department of agriculture conducted a study in 1994, which showed that two hundred thousand five hundred and ninety-six animals had been used in carrying out research (Peggs 634). However, this number may appear considerably small, but the fact that it does not contain the sum of rats and mice that were used in the experiment that constitutes ninety percent of animals used in research makes the number considerably high. Additionally, the figures showed that sixty percent of the animals that were subjected to testing suffered no pain or stress, thirty percent of them underwent distress and pain but were relieved while the remaining ten percent underwent pain but were not relieved. The use of animals in research also saw more than two thousand animals being sent into the space on the shuttle Columbia that took place in the year 1998, an event that was followed by the regulation of pocket pets that required “retail pet shops that sell pets to be licenced as dealers,” in accordance with the Animals Welfare Act (Stokes 1300). Additionally, more regulations were passed to ensure that animals were kept under a serene environment in terms of climatic conditions especially when enclosed in cottages. One such regulation that was passed in the late 90s required cats and dogs to be placed in good climatic conditions and that they were not supposed to be exposed to a combination of temperatures and humidity that will affect their well-being. Therefore, any animals that happen to be in such conditions need to be attended to by applying the right measures that will ensure the impacts of the adverse climatic conditions are alleviated. In conclusion, the use of animals testing is still a common practice ranging from projects regarding alcohol-induces aggression to pain treatment, but a 2007 report has helped to shade light on the need for the use of vitro techniques that make use of human cells. However, researchers still believe that the new methods cannot fully provide conclusive results and will, therefore, need to be complemented by animal research. The other effort that has been implemented on the side of reducing the use of animals in research includes the banning of cosmetic imports and exports that contained ingredients tested on animals by the European Union. The breeding of chimpanzees that were stopped in the year 2007 has also seen the U.S. government retire close to three hundred and ten chimpanzees, even though opponents feared that the move would lead to a setback in the development of treatments and vaccines.

Works Cited

Martins, Ana Raquel, and Nuno Henrique Franco. "A Critical Look at Biomedical Journals' Policies on Animal Research by Use of a Novel Tool: The EXEMPLAR Scale." Animals (2076-2615) 5.2 (2015): 315-331. Print. Jones, Robert, and Ray Greek. "A Review of the Institute Of Medicine's Analysis of Using Chimpanzees in Biomedical Research." Science & Engineering Ethics 20.2 (2014): 481-504. Print. Langley, Gill, et al. "Lessons from Toxicology: Developing a 21St-Century Paradigm for Medical Research." Environmental Health Perspectives 123.11 (2015): A268-A272. Print. Peggs, Kay. "An Insufferable Business: Ethics, Nonhuman Animals, and Biomedical Experiments." Animals (2076-2615) 5.3 (2015): 624-642. Print. Stokes, W. S. "Animals and The 3Rs in Toxicology Research and Testing." Human & Experimental Toxicology 34.12 (2015): 1297-1303. Print. Verrinder, Joy M., Remo Ostini, and Clive J. C. Phillips. "Differences in Moral Judgment on Animal and Human Ethics Issues between University Students in Animal-Related, Human Medical and Arts Programs." Plos ONE 11.3 (2016): 1-15. Print. Medewar, Margaret E., and Claudia B. Isaac. "Learning from difference: The potentially transforming experience of community-university collaboration." Journal of Planning Education and Research 17.4 (1998): 334-347. Print. Wever, Kimberley E., et al. "Determinants of the Efficacy of Cardiac Ischemic Preconditioning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Animal Studies." Plos ONE 10.11 (2015): 1-17. Print.

Cite this page

Share with friends using:

Removal Request

Finished papers: 2179

This paper is created by writer with

ID 281970042

If you want your paper to be:

Well-researched, fact-checked, and accurate

Original, fresh, based on current data

Eloquently written and immaculately formatted

275 words = 1 page double-spaced

Get your papers done by pros!

Other Pages

Actus reus essays, pitchford essays, fellner essays, kahl essays, stoll essays, mercier essays, dusen essays, wann essays, appel essays, population of the world essays, geodesists essays, cillo essays, contraindication essays, mountaineering essays, crown prince essays, free essay on nursing program writing assignment, the appearance of monstrosity examining what defines a monster essay example, what are the two main issues in the current israeli palestinian conflict term paper example, adverse effect research paper, a general description business plan sample, identity thief and identity theft essay example, free essay on total quality management, example of competition in healthcare essay, psycho social dimensions of hearing loss essay examples, relationship between the federal government and domestic policy report example, free essay on how does fiba challenge the nba, capstone simulation round 3 research paper, free research paper on it security policy framework, little albert and classical conditioning essay, you pick the topic that fit the prompt critical thinking example, trait approach research paper examples, critical analysis of the st louis arch essay, md6 blog answers critical thinking examples, you pick one of the questions argumentative essay sample, art architecture essays example 3, what is the relevance of the two novels research proposal sample, example of critical thinking on the play donovans charge and fences, learn to craft reports on employment environment with this example, generalized anxiety disorder report samples, write by example of this part1 storm sewer design essay, good report on user groups and users of wlan in a school environment.

Password recovery email has been sent to [email protected]

Use your new password to log in

You are not register!

By clicking Register, you agree to our Terms of Service and that you have read our Privacy Policy .

Now you can download documents directly to your device!

Check your email! An email with your password has already been sent to you! Now you can download documents directly to your device.

or Use the QR code to Save this Paper to Your Phone

The sample is NOT original!

Short on a deadline?

Don't waste time. Get help with 11% off using code - GETWOWED

No, thanks! I'm fine with missing my deadline

Persuasive Essay On Animal Testing

The California Biomedical Research Association states that nearly every medical breakthrough in the last 100 years has resulted directly from research using animals. Animals are extremely important to medical testing. Without animals to complete this research, people wouldn't have the vaccines and treatments for sickness and diseases. Experiments in which dogs had their pancreases removed led directly to the discovery of insulin, critical to saving the lives of diabetics. Animals testing also isn't as inhumane as it might seem. Animal medical tested has contributed to help understand a numerous amount of illnesses like breast cancer, brain injury, childhood leukemia, cystic fibrosis, and malaria. People often wonder why we use animals instead of humans to do our research. One of the reasons is because even the most powerful supercomputers are unable to accurately simulate the workings of complex organs such as the brain. Factors as well as lifespan come into play too. so researchers can study the effects of treatments or genetic manipulation over a …show more content…

Many animals can suffer from the research depending on the nature of the subject, but, the AWA (Animal Welfare Act) also requires regular inspections by veterinarians. All proposals to use animals for research must be approved by an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) set up by each research facility. According to Nature Genetics "stressed or crowded animals produce unreliable research results, and many phenotypes are only accessible in contented animals in enriched environments, it is in the best interests of the researchers not to cut corners or to neglect welfare issues." Also, animals may even benefit from testing in the end. Animal testing has also been instrumental in saving endangered species from extinction, including the black-footed ferret, the California condor and the tamarins of

More about Persuasive Essay On Animal Testing